Cited by 189Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisVibration and Dynamic Analysis

Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration based on DDMF and ADMF

Li, Chunxiang·2002·Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Abstract

Multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) consisting of many tuned mass dampers (TMDs) with a uniform distribution of natural frequencies are taken into consideration for attenuating undesirable vibration of a structure under the ground acceleration. A study is conducted to search for the preferable MTMD which performs better and is easily manufactured from the five available models (i.e. MTMD‐1 – MTMD‐5), which comprise various combinations of the stiffness, mass, damping coefficient and damping ratio in the MTMD. The major objective of the present study then is to evaluate and compare the control performance of these five models. The structure is represented by its mode‐generalized system in the specific vibration mode being controlled by adopting the mode reduced‐order approach. The optimum parameters of the MTMD‐1 – MTMD‐5 are investigated to reveal the influence of the important parameters on their effectiveness and robustness using a numerical searching technique. The parameters include the frequency spacing, average damping ratio, tuning frequency ratio, mass ratio and total number. The criteria selected for the optimum searching are the minimization of the maximum value of the displacement dynamic magnification factor (DDMF) and that of the acceleration dynamic magnification factor (ADMF) of the structure with the MTMD‐1 – MTMD‐5 (i.e. Min.Max.DDMF and Min.Max.ADMF). It is demonstrated that the optimum MTMD‐1 and MTMD‐4 yield approximately the same control performance, and o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eqe.128

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Li, C.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Chunxiang
Venue
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01-25
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
897-919
ISSN
  • 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9845
OpenAlex
W2130232013
Cited by
189
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
25.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
Keywords
multiple tuned mass dampers, tuned mass damper, ground acceleration, structural vibration control, dynamic magnification factor, mode reduction, damping ratio, frequency spacing, mass ratio, robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review