The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incremental dynamic analysis
Abstract
Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is a parametric analysis method that has recently emerged in several different forms to estimate more thoroughly structural performance under seismic loads. It involves subjecting a structural model to one (or more) ground motion record(s), each scaled to multiple levels of intensity, thus producing one (or more) curve(s) of response parameterized versus intensity level. To establish a common frame of reference, the fundamental concepts are analysed, a unified terminology is proposed, suitable algorithms are presented, and properties of the IDA curve are looked into for both single‐degree‐of‐freedom and multi‐degree‐of‐freedom structures. In addition, summarization techniques for multi‐record IDA studies and the association of the IDA study with the conventional static pushover analysis and the yield reduction R‐factor are discussed. Finally, in the framework of performance‐based earthquake engineering, the assessment of demand and capacity is viewed through the lens of an IDA study. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines
Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., & Foutch, D. A. (2002) · Journal of Structural Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationIncorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings
Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., Deierlein, G. G., & Baker, J. W. (2009) · Structural Safety · doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.002 · Cited by 469
Goulet, C. A., Haselton, C. B., Mitrani‐Reiser, J., Beck, J. L., Deierlein, G. G., Porter, K. A., & Stewart, J. P. (2007) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.694 · Cited by 398
Analytical fragility assessment using unscaled ground motion records
Jalayer, F., Ebrahimian, H., Miano, A., Manfredi, G., & Sezen, H. (2017) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.2922 · Cited by 317
On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves
Kiani, J., Camp, C., & Pezeshk, S. (2019) · Computers & Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004 · Cited by 312
Rota, M., Penna, A., & Magenes, G. (2010) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.009 · Cited by 268
Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves
Lallemant, D., Kiremidjian, A., & Burton, H. (2015) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.2522 · Cited by 263
Matta, E. (2018) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.2987 · Cited by 47
Matta, E. (2021) · Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00973-2 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A.
- Venue
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-19
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 491-514
- ISSN
- 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9845
- OpenAlex
- W2082179468
- Cited by
- 4,220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
