Lifecycle cost optimization of tuned mass dampers for the seismic improvement of inelastic structures
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The seismic performance of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) on structures undergoing inelastic deformations may largely depend on the ground motion intensity. By estimating the impact of each seismic intensity on the overall cost of future seismic damages, lifecycle cost (LCC) proves a rational metric for evaluating the benefits of TMDs on inelastic structures. However, no incorporation of this metric into an optimization framework is reported yet. This paper presents a methodology for the LCC‐optimal design of TMDs on inelastic structures, which minimizes the total seismic LCC of the combined building‐TMD system. Its distinctive features are the assumption of a mass‐proportional TMD cost model, the adoption of an iterative suboptimization procedure, and the initialization of the TMD frequency and damping ratios according to a conventional linear TMD design technique. The methodology is applied to the seismic improvement of the SAC‐LA benchmark buildings, taken as representative of standard steel moment‐resisting frame office buildings in LA, California. Results show that, despite their limited performance at the highest intensity levels, LCC‐optimal TMDs considerably reduce the total LCC, to an extent that depends on both the building vulnerability and the TMD unit cost. They systematically present large mass ratios (around 10%) and frequency and damping ratios close to their respective linearly designed optima. Simulations reveal the effectiveness of the proposed design methodology and the importance of adopting a nonlinear model to correctly evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of TMDs on ordinary structures in highly seismic areas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LCC-optimal TMD design systematically introduces large mass ratios around 10% and frequency and damping ratios near their respective linearly designed optima.
“They systematically introduced large mass ratios (around 10%) and frequency and damping ratios near to their respective linearly designed optima.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Matta [137]
Simulations show the effectiveness of the proposed LCC design methodology and the importance of accepting a nonlinear model to correctly measure the cost-effectiveness of TMDs on ordinary structures in highly seismic areas.
“Simulations disclose the effectiveness of the proposed design methodology and the importance of acceptance a nonlinear model to correctly measure the cost-effectiveness of TMDs on ordinary structures in highly seismic areas.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Matta [137]
Despite limited performance at the highest intensity levels, LCC-optimal TMDs considerably reduce total lifecycle cost, to an extent depending on building vulnerability and TMD unit cost.
“Results show that, despite their limited performance at the highest intensity levels, LCC-optimal TMDs considerably reduce the total LCC, to an extent that depends on both the building vulnerability and the TMD unit cost.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as Matta [137]
Cites
Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas
Hoang, N., Fujino, Y., & Warnitchai, P. (2008) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.007 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., & Balendra, T. (2013) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.044 · Cited by 56 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Ropt;H μ ð Þ 1⁄4 min r;ς Tfθu μ; r; ς ð Þ ∞ (18) and ropt;H μ ð Þ; ςopt;H μ ð Þ h i 1⁄4 argmin r;ς Tfθu μ; r; ς ð Þ ∞ (19)”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review
Rahimi, F., Aghayari, R., & Samali, B. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091571 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Matta, E. (2021) · Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00973-2 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Matta, E.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Matta, Emiliano
- ORCID
- Matta, Emiliano
- Venue
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-02
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 714-737
- ISSN
- 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9845
- OpenAlex
- W2765802617
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- porto.polito.it
- Locations
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
- Keywords
- tuned mass damper, inelastic structures, seismic retrofitting, steel moment-resisting frames, nonlinear structural response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review