An alternative methodology for designing tuned mass dampers to reduce seismic vibrations in building structures
Abstract
SUMMARY: It is well established that small tuned mass dampers (TMDs) attached to structures are very effective in reducing excessive harmonic vibrations induced by external loads but are not as interesting within the context of earthquake engineering problems. For this reason, large mass ratio TMDs have been proposed with the objective of adding a significant amount of damping to structures, thus constituting a good means of reducing structural response in these cases. This solution has other important and attractive dynamic features such as robustness to system uncertainties and reduction of the motion of the inertial mass. In this context, this paper aims to describe an alternative methodology to existing procedures used to tune these devices to earthquake loads and to present some additional considerations regarding its performance in controlling seismic vibrations. The main feature of the proposed method consists of establishing a direct proportion between the damping ratios of the structure's first two vibration modes and the adopted mass ratio. By equalizing the damping ratios of the system's main vibration modes, this proposal also facilitates the use of simplified methods, such as modal analysis based on response spectra. To demonstrate the usefulness of this alternative methodology, an application example is presented, which was also used to perform a parametric study involving other tuning methods and to estimate mass ratio values from which there is no significant advantage in increasing the TMD mass. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using tuned TMDs in building structures significantly reduces seismic response of building floors in terms of relative displacements and absolute accelerations.
“The results show the showed a significant reduction of the seismic response of the building floors in terms of relative displacements and absolute accelerations.”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as [73]
Mass ratios much higher than 40% lead to an unbalanced structural solution by having a top mass much larger than the bottom mass.
“Mass ratios much higher than 40% were not recommended because they lead to an unbalanced structural solution by having a top mass that is much larger than the bottom mass”
From Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review (2020) · cites this paper as [73]
Cites
Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas
Hoang, N., Fujino, Y., & Warnitchai, P. (2008) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.007 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marian, L., & Giaralis, A. (2014) · Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007 · Cited by 828 · see citing works
Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers
Elias, S., & Matsagar, V. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.015 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Application of Tuned Mass Dampers for Structural Vibration Control: A State-of-the-art Review
Rahimi, F., Aghayari, R., & Samali, B. (2020) · Civil Engineering Journal · doi:10.28991/cej-2020-03091571 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
“Moutinho [73] An alternative methodology for designing tuned mass dampers to reduce seismic vibrations in building structures 1- Using tuning TMDs in the context of reducing seismic vibrations of building structures based on mass ratio on two modes of vibration.”
MethodKang, X., Huang, Q., Wu, Z., Tang, J., Jiang, X., & Lei, S. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2023.043936 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moutinho, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Moutinho, Carlos
- ORCID
- Moutinho, Carlos
- Venue
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2059-2073
- ISSN
- 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9845
- OpenAlex
- W1543915601
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
- Keywords
- tuned mass damper, seismic vibration control, structural damping, response spectra, modal analysis, building structures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review