Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal energy‐based seismic design of non‐conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) implemented via inter‐story isolation

Reggio, Anna, Angelis, Maurizio De·2015·Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Abstract

Summary: Inter‐story isolation, an effective strategy for mitigating the seismic risk of both new and existing buildings, has gained more and more interest in recent years as alternative to base isolation, whenever the latter results to be impractical, technically difficult or uneconomic. As suggested by the name, the technique consists in inserting flexible isolators at floor levels other than the base along the height of a multi‐story building, thus realizing a non‐conventional Tuned Mass Damper (TMD). Consistent with this, an optimal design methodology is developed in the present paper with the objective of achieving the global protection of both the structural portions separated by the inter‐story isolation system, that is, the lower portion (below the isolation system) and the isolated upper portion (above the isolation system). The optimization procedure is formulated on the basis of an energy performance criterion that consists in maximizing the ratio between the energy dissipated in the isolation system and the input energy globally transferred to the entire structure. Numerical simulations, performed under natural accelerograms with different frequency content and considering increasing isolation levels along the height of a reference frame structure, are used to investigate the seismic performance of the optimized inter‐story isolation systems. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eqe.2548

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199801)27:1<49::AID-EQE718>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  2. Villaverde R, 2000, Implementation study of aseismic roof isolation system in 13‐story building, Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 2, 17
  3. 10.1193/1.1850528 · DOI
  4. Tiang Z, 2008, Slide roof systems for dynamic response reduction, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 647, 10.1002/eqe.780 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/eqe.2174 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1002/eqe.933 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/eqe.934 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13632461003668020 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/eqe.2187 · DOI
  10. ReggioA De AngelisM.Optimization of a non‐conventional TMD implemented via inter‐storey isolation.Proceedings of Eurodyn 2014 ‐ IX International Conference on Structural Dynamics:Porto Portugal 2014;1713–1720.
  11. 10.1007/s11709-013-0195-9 · DOI
  12. Soong TT, 1997, Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering
  13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:10(1082) · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1995)121:10(1082 · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/eqe.1004 · doi:10.1002/eqe.1004
  15. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.035 · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.035
  16. 10.1002/eqe.2203 · doi:10.1002/eqe.2203
  17. Murakami K, 2001, The prediction for seismic responses of the two‐mass model with the mid‐story isolation system, Journal of Structural Construction Engineering, AIJ, 549, 51, 10.3130/aijs.66.51_7 · doi:10.3130/aijs.66.51_7
  18. 10.1193/1.1585566 · doi:10.1193/1.1585566
  19. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0971-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/9780470172742 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Lin Y, 1967, Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics
  22. 10.1002/eqe.2304 · DOI
  23. Warburton G, 1982, Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 10, 908, 10.1002/eqe.4290100304 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Chey M, 2012, Parametric control of structural responses using an optimal passive tuned mass damper under stationary Gaussian white noise excitations, Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 6, 267
  25. 10.1002/stc.166 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1006/jsvi.2000.3188 · DOI
  27. CiampiV De AngelisM.Optimal design of passive control systems based on energy dissipation for earthquake protection of structures.Proceedings of Eurodyn 1996 ‐ III International Conference on Structural Dynamics:Firenze Italy 1996;525–532.
  28. 10.1002/eqe.4290130105 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::aid-eqe664>3.0.co;2-z
  30. 10.1002/eqe.2271 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/eqe.92 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Reggio, A., & Angelis, M. D.
Venue
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-20
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1623-1642
ISSN
  • 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9845
OpenAlex
W2151178410
Cited by
191
References
2
FWCI
14.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
AXA Research Fund (Continuity of essential services in the face of earthquake emergency)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.