Numerical and experimental study of the performance of a single‐sided vibro‐impact track nonlinear energy sink
Abstract
Summary: This paper proposes a single‐sided vibro‐impact track nonlinear energy sink (SSVI track NES) as an effective way to mitigate the effects of impulsive and seismic excitation on building structures. The SSVI track NES is a passive energy dissipation device, which consists of a mass moving along a track, the shape of which provides a nonlinear restoring force to the mass. Previous studies have analyzed the track NES, which considers the track shape to be smooth and symmetric. By introducing a discontinuity into the shape of the track (e.g., through impact), energy in the primary structure can be scattered to higher frequency responses where it can be dissipated at a faster rate. First, the SSVI track NES is analytically investigated and numerically optimized base on a two degree‐of‐freedom primary structure. The results of numerical simulations show that the SSVI track NES can be more efficient than both the track NES and tuned mass damper in reducing the response of the primary structure. Based on the analytical studies, the SSVI track NES is experimentally realized and investigated when subjected to both impulse‐like and seismic excitations, confirming the numerical predictions and validating the analytical model of the device. Finally, the robustness of the SSVI track NES is investigated numerically. The results of this investigation indicate that the SSVI track NES remains effective over a broad range of input excitation energy levels, as well as during significant changes in the stiffness of the primary structure. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The track NES modified by adding an impact barrier at one side to incorporate the single-sided vibro-impact effect further enhanced the efficiency of shock mitigation.
“The track NES was also modified by adding an impact barrier at one side of the special shape curved track to incorporate the single-sided vibro-impact (SSVI) effect which further enhanced the efficiency of shock mitigation [132].”
From A review on nonlinear energy sinks: designs, analysis and applications of impact and rotary types (2023) · cites this paper as [132]
The performance of the track SSVI NES in [132] outperformed TMD performance in the considered 2-story lab structure subjected to various intensity impulsive and seismic excitation inputs.
“The performance of the track SSVI NES in [132] was found outperforming the TMD performance in the considered 2-story lab structure subjected to various intensity impulsive and seismic excitation inputs.”
From A review on nonlinear energy sinks: designs, analysis and applications of impact and rotary types (2023) · cites this paper as [132]
Cites
Targeted energy transfers in vibro-impact oscillators for seismic mitigation
Nucera, F., Vakakis, A. F., McFarland, D. M., Bergman, L. A., & Kerschen, G. (2007) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-006-9189-7 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Nucera, F., Lo Iacono, F., McFarland, D. M., Bergman, L. A., & Vakakis, A. F. (2008) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2007.11.018 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review on nonlinear energy sinks: designs, analysis and applications of impact and rotary types
Saeed, A. S., Abdul Nasar, R., & AL-Shudeifat, M. A. (2023) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-022-08094-y · Cited by 208 · see citing works
A magnetic Bi-stable nonlinear energy sink for structural seismic control
Chen, Y.-Y., Qian, Z.-C., Zhao, W., & Chang, C.-M. (2020) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115233 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Wang, J., Wierschem, N. E., Wang, B., & Spencer, B. F. (2020) · The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings · doi:10.1002/tal.1692 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationGzal, M., Vakakis, A. F., Bergman, L. A., & Gendelman, O. V. (2021) · Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.106012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, J., Wierschem, N., Spencer, B. F., & Lu, X.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- University of Tennessee System (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering Tongji University Shanghai 200092 China
- Venue
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635-652
- ISSN
- 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9845
- OpenAlex
- W2192735474
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (grant no. HR0011‐10‐1‐0077)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 91315301‐4, no. 51261120377)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
- Keywords
- nonlinear energy sink, passive energy dissipation, seismic response mitigation, impulse excitation, building structures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review