Cited by 51Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesControl Systems and IdentificationBladed Disk Vibration Dynamics

Algorithms for time synchronization of wireless structural monitoring sensors

Lei, Ying, Kiremidjian, Anne S., Nair, K. Krishnan, Lynch, Jerome P., Law, Kincho H.·2005·Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Abstract

Dense networks of wireless structural health monitoring systems can effectively remove the disadvantages associated with current wire-based sparse sensing systems. However, recorded data sets may have relative time-delays due to interference in radio transmission or inherent internal sensor clock errors. For structural system identification and damage detection purposes, sensor data require that they are time synchronized. The need for time synchronization of sensor data is illustrated through a series of tests on asynchronous data sets. Results from the identification of structural modal parameters show that frequencies and damping ratios are not influenced by the asynchronous data; however, the error in identifying structural mode shapes can be significant. The results from these tests are summarized in Appendix A. The objective of this paper is to present algorithms for measurement data synchronization. Two algorithms are proposed for this purpose. The first algorithm is applicable when the input signal to a structure can be measured. The time-delay between an output measurement and the input is identified based on an ARX (auto-regressive model with exogenous input) model for the input–output pair recordings. The second algorithm can be used for a structure subject to ambient excitation, where the excitation cannot be measured. An ARMAV (auto-regressive moving average vector) model is constructed from two output signals and the time-delay between them is evaluated. The proposed algorithms are verified with simulation data and recorded seismic response data from multi-story buildings. The influence of noise on the time-delay estimates is also assessed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eqe.432

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lei, Y., Kiremidjian, A. S., Nair, K. K., Lynch, J. P., & Law, K. H.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Kiremidjian, Anne S.
Venue
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
555-573
ISSN
  • 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9845
OpenAlex
W2148120189
Cited by
50
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics
Keywords
clock synchronization, wireless structural health monitoring, sensor data synchronization, time delay estimation, ARX model, modal parameter identification, mode shape identification, ambient excitation, seismic response, multi-storey buildings, damage detection, asynchronous data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review