The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Renewable hydrogen production
Open accessAbstract
The U.S. Department of Energy and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory are developing technologies to produce hydrogen from renewable, sustainable sources. A cost goal of $2.00–$3.00 kg−1 of hydrogen has been identified as the range at which delivered hydrogen becomes cost competitive with gasoline for passenger vehicles. Electrolysis of water is a standard commercial technology for producing hydrogen. Using wind and solar resources to produce the electricity for the process creates a renewable system. Biomass-to-hydrogen processes, including gasification, pyrolysis, and fermentation, are less well-developed technologies. These processes offer the possibility of producing hydrogen from energy crops and from biomass materials such as forest residue and municipal sewage. Solar energy can be used to produce hydrogen from water and biomass by several conversion pathways. Concentrated solar energy can generate high temperatures at which thermochemical reactions can be used to split water. Photoelectrochemical water splitting and photobiology are long-term options for producing hydrogen from water using solar energy. All these technologies are in the development stage. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
US Department of Energy (USDOE), W., Perlack, R., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), O. O. S. T. B. T. O. (., Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), O. R., USDA, Wright, L., Turhollow, A., Graham, R., Stokes, B., & Erbach, D. (2005) · doi:10.2172/1216415 · Cited by 1,327
Biomass Gasification in Supercritical Water
Antal, M. J., Allen, S. G., Schulman, D., Xu, X., & Divilio, R. J. (2000) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0003436 · Cited by 610
Spath, P., Aden, A., Eggeman, T., Ringer, M., Wallace, B., & Jechura, J. (2005) · doi:10.2172/15016221 · Cited by 299
Melis, A., Neidhardt, J., & Benemann, J. R. (1998) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1023/a:1008076231267 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Kondratenko, E. V., Mul, G., Baltrusaitis, J., Larrazábal, G. O., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee41272e · Cited by 1,802
Heterostructures for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: A Review
Zhao, G., Rui, K., Dou, S. X., & Sun, W. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201803291 · Cited by 1,422
Ethylene glycol: properties, synthesis, and applications
Yue, H., Zhao, Y., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15359a · Cited by 1,180
(2016) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.293 · Cited by 1,112
Benck, J. D., Chen, Z., Kuritzky, L. Y., Forman, A. J., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs300451q · Cited by 1,091
Metadata
- Authors
- Turner, J., Sverdrup, G., Mann, M. K., Maness, P.-C., Kroposki, B., Ghirardi, M., Evans, R. J., & Blake, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Energy Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 379-407
- ISSN
- 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-114X
- OpenAlex
- W2091250208
- Cited by
- 1,032
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 31.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renewable hydrogen production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/er.1372
- The paper
- Turner, J., Sverdrup, G., Mann, M. K., Maness, P.-C., Kroposki, B., Ghirardi, M., Evans, R. J., & Blake, D. (2008). Renewable hydrogen production. International Journal of Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
