Cited by 1,091Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins

Amorphous Molybdenum Sulfide Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Production: Insights into the Origin of their Catalytic Activity

Benck, Jesse D., Chen, Zhebo, Kuritzky, Leah Y., Forman, Arnold J., Jaramillo, Thomas F.·2012·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

We present a scalable wet chemical synthesis for a catalytically active nanostructured amorphous molybdenum sulfide material. The catalyst film is one of the most active nonprecious metal materials for electrochemical hydrogen evolution, drawing 10 mA/cm 2 at ∼200 mV overpotential. To identify the active phase of the material, we perform X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy after testing under a variety of conditions. As deposited, the catalyst resembles amorphous MoS 3, but domains resembling MoS 2 in composition and chemical state are created under reaction conditions and may contribute to this material’s high electrochemical activity. The activity scales with electrochemically active surface area, suggesting that the rough, nanostructured catalyst morphology also contributes substantially to the film’s high activity. Electrochemical stability tests indicate that the catalyst remains highly active throughout prolonged operation. The overpotential required to attain a current density of 10 mA/cm 2 increases by only 57 mV after 10 000 reductive potential cycles. Our enhanced understanding of this highly active amorphous molybdenum sulfide hydrogen evolution catalyst may facilitate the development of economical electrochemical hydrogen production systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cs300451q

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benck, J. D., Chen, Z., Kuritzky, L. Y., Forman, A. J., & Jaramillo, T. F.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Jaramillo, Thomas F.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2012-08-10
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
1916-1923
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010924650
Cited by
1,091
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 1
FWCI
23.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001060)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Keywords
amorphous molybdenum sulfide, electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution, non-noble metal catalysts, wet chemical synthesis, molybdenum trisulfide, catalyst morphology, electrochemically active surface area, electrochemical stability, overpotential, hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review