The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on coal-to-liquid fuels and its coal consumption
Open accessAbstract
Continued reliance on oil is unsustainable and this has resulted in interest in alternative fuels. Coal-to-liquids (CTL) can supply liquid fuels and have been successfully used in several cases, particularly in South Africa. This article reviews CTL theory and technology. Understanding the fundamental aspects of coal liquefaction technologies is vital for planning and policy-making, as future CTL systems will be integrated in a much larger global energy and fuel utilization system. Conversion ratios for CTL are generally estimated to be between 1 and 2 barrels/ton coal. This puts a strict limitation on future CTL capacity imposed by future coal production volumes, regardless of other factors such as economics, emissions or environmental concerns. Assuming that 10% of world coal production can be diverted to CTL, the contribution to liquid fuel supply will be limited to only a few mega barrels per day. This prevents CTL from becoming a viable mitigation plan for liquid fuel shortage on a global scale. However, it is still possible for individual nations to derive significant shares of their fuel supply from CTL, but those nations must also have access to equally significant coal production capacities. It is unrealistic to claim that CTL provides a feasible solution to liquid fuels shortages created by peak oil. For the most part, it can only be a minor contributor and must be combined with other strategies. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Fischer-Tropsch process: 1950-2000
Dry, M. E. (2002) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00453-9 · Cited by 2,061
Cited by
Technical review on jet fuel production
Liu, G., Yan, B., & Chen, G. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.025 · Cited by 299
Combustion characteristics and emissions of Fischer–Tropsch diesel fuels in IC engines
Gill, S. S., Tsolakis, A., Dearn, K. D., & Rodríguez-Fernández, J. (2011) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2010.09.001 · Cited by 277
Pryor, S. W., Smithers, J., Lyne, P., & van Antwerpen, R. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.069 · Cited by 90
Warshay, B., Pan, J., & Sgouridis, S. (2011) · Biofuels · doi:10.4155/bfs.10.70 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Höök, M., & Aleklett, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Energy Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-30
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 848-864
- ISSN
- 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969780803
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on coal-to-liquid fuels and its coal consumption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/er.1596
- The paper
- Höök, M., & Aleklett, K. (2010). A review on coal-to-liquid fuels and its coal consumption. International Journal of Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1596
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.