Cited by 90Environmental Impact and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, Agriculture AnalysisSugarcane Cultivation and Processing

Impact of agricultural practices on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for South African sugarcane production

Open access
Pryor, Scott W., Smithers, Jeff, Lyne, Peter, van Antwerpen, Rianto·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.069

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pryor, S. W., Smithers, J., Lyne, P., & van Antwerpen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • South African Sugarcane Research Institute (ZA)
Corresponding author
Pryor, Scott W.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
141
Pages
137-145
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519455190
Cited by
90
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Food and Agriculture (ND01476)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Keywords
sugarcane production, agricultural energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, irrigation, mechanization, soil compaction, fertilizer use, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review