The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State of charge estimation using an unscented filter for high power lithium ion cells
Open accessAbstract
High power lithium ion batteries are increasingly used in power tools, hybrid electric vehicles and military applications, as a transient power source capable of delivering instant energy, around a relatively fixed state of charge (SOC). Maintaining the battery within pre-specified limits for SOC is important, since lithium ion batteries are prone to safety and/or performance issues during overcharge or rapid discharge below the cut-off voltages. With an increase in the number of cells used in the battery, SOC has a crucial role in cell balancing and optimization of the pack performance. Several techniques have been proposed for the SOC estimation. Most of the existing literature supports an empirical model based on either an electric circuit, arbitrary pole placement or an analytical expression with an arbitrary set of parameters. In spite of their simplicity, the empirical battery models do not provide information on the physical cell limitations. Alternatively, a rigorous electrochemical cell model, aimed at incorporating transport, kinetic and thermodynamic limitations, can be used to estimate parameters that hold a physical significance and hence provide an accurate measure of the cell performance. However, the demand for onboard estimation devices requires estimation techniques that are computationally efficient. In this work, estimation of the SOC of a lithium ion cell using an unscented filtering algorithm is illustrated. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the proposed methodology are briefly discussed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221597 · Cited by 4,328 · cited 1×
“A comprehensive model including such limitations [35] will be difficult to cast into the form of linear ODEs to be used along with an EKF.”
MethodHuet, F. (1998) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(97)02665-7 · Cited by 593
Fuzzy logic modelling of state-of-charge and available capacity of nickel/metal hydride batteries
Singh, P., Fennie, C., & Reisner, D. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.03.035 · Cited by 117
Cited by
Waag, W., Fleischer, C., & Sauer, D. U. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.064 · Cited by 1,059
Sun, F., Hu, X., Zou, Y., & Li, S. (2011) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.059 · Cited by 614
He, W., Williard, N., Chen, C., & Pecht, M. (2014) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.04.059 · Cited by 539
SOC estimation for lithium-ion battery using the LSTM-RNN with extended input and constrained output
Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Cheng, W., & Zhu, Q. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125375 · Cited by 362
Liu, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, C., & Wu, J. (2014) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.072 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Santhanagopalan, S., & White, R. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Energy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-163
- ISSN
- 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093865384
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.