Cited by 72Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a cohort of adult patients

Nakai, Yoshikatsu, Nin, Kazuko, Noma, Shun'ichi, Teramukai, Satoshi, Wonderlich, Stephen A.·2016·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare clinical symptoms and psychometric analysis of adult patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) with those with anorexia nervosa (AN). METHOD: We completed a retrospective review of adult patients with a feeding and eating disorder assessed between 1990 and 2005 that qualified for a diagnosis of ARFID. Patients with ARFID were compared with those with AN, with respect to the demographics, clinical symptoms and psychometric analysis. RESULTS: Using the criteria of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 95 (9.2%) of 1029 patients with a feeding and eating disorder met the criteria for ARFID. All patients with ARFID were women. The ARFID group had a significantly shorter duration of illness, lower rates of hospital admission history and less severe psychopathology than the AN group. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with ARFID in this study were clinically distinct from those with AN and somewhat different from paediatric patients with ARFID in previous studies. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2476

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ARFID symptoms in adults are severe and impairing.

    “The few studies that have examined ARFID and associated psychopathology in adults suggest that its symptoms are severe and impairing (e.g., Nakai, Nin, Noma, Teramukai, & Wonderlich, 2016); Zickgraf, Franklin, & Rozin, 2016)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakai, Y., Nin, K., Noma, S., Teramukai, S., & Wonderlich, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto Institute of Health Sciences Kyoto Japan
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Nakai, Yoshikatsu
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-04
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
528-530
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W2528686235
Cited by
72
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
12.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, anorexia nervosa, adult patients, clinical symptoms, psychopathology, disease duration, eating disorders, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, China, Eating, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Psychometrics, Psychopathology, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review