Cited by 102Eating Disorders and BehaviorsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

COVID‐19 and eating disorders during confinement: Analysis of factors associated with resilience and aggravation of symptoms

Open access
Baenas, Isabel, Caravaca‐Sanz, Elena, Granero, Roser, Sánchez, Isabel, Riesco, Nadine, Testa, Giulia, Vintró‐Alcaraz, Cristina, Treasure, Janet +2 more·2020·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the level of deterioration in functioning of ED patients during confinement, due to COVID-19, and examine potential contributing factors (coping strategies, anxiety-depressive symptomatology and personality traits). METHODS: A total of 74 ED patients in treatment before the COVID-19 outbreak, contributed to this study. Baseline pre-treatment evaluation included the SCL-90R, TCI-R, EDI-2 and Y-FAS 2.0 questionnaires for general psychopathology, personality and ED severity indexes. ED symptoms, coping strategies, socio-demographic data and COVID-19 concerns were collected by clinicians through a semi-structured telephone survey during lockdown. RESULTS: A deterioration in ED symptoms and general psychopathology (anxiety and depression), during lockdown, was associated with low self-directedness. Higher ED symptomatology during confinement was associated with less-adaptive coping strategies to deal with lockdown situation leading to an increase in weight. CONCLUSIONS: These specific vulnerability factors to further confinement or stressful situations may help design personalized preventive and therapeutic approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2771

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Baenas et al. (2020) sample of 74 patients with EDs, a significant proportion experienced worsening of ED symptoms, but this finding was only in 19 patients (25.7%).

    “Thus, the authors concluded that a significant proportion of patients experienced the worsening of ED symptoms, even if this finding was only in 19 patients (25.7%).”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Baenas et al. (2020)

  • In Baenas et al. (2020), path analysis found a direct effect of the TCI-R dimension self-directedness on the worsening of EDs.

    “However, performing a path analysis, they found a direct effect of the TCI-R dimension “self-directedness” on the worsening of EDs.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Baenas et al. (2020)

  • In Baenas et al. (2020), the majority of the sample (n = 55) did not report a significant variation of their symptoms.

    “Majority of the samples (n = 55) did not report a significant variation of their symptoms.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Baenas et al. (2020)

  • The Baenas et al. study was focused on a small sample (n = 74) using 32 different domain/dimensions belonging to four different scales.

    “However, this study was focused on the evaluation of a small sample (n = 74) using 32 different domain/dimensions, which belongs to four different scales.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Baenas et al., 2020

  • In one study, TCI-R self-directedness was the only discriminating factor between patients with eating disorders who did and did not experience worsening of symptoms.

    “In one study (Baenas et al., 2020), TCI-R self-directedness was found as the only discriminating factor between patients with EDs who did and did not experience the worsening of their symptoms.”

    From Eating Disorders Spectrum During the COVID Pandemic: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Baenas et al., 2020

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 102

Authors
Baenas, I., Caravaca‐Sanz, E., Granero, R., Sánchez, I., Riesco, N., Testa, G., Vintró‐Alcaraz, C., Treasure, J., Jiménez‐Murcia, S., & Fernández‐Aranda, F.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • Department of Psychiatry Bellvitge University Hospital‐IDIBELL Barcelona Spain
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Fernández‐Aranda, Fernando
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
855-863
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W3066711470
Cited by
102
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 5
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI17/01167)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, eating disorders, lockdown, resilience, symptom deterioration, coping strategies, self-direction, anxiety, depression, personality traits, weight gain, vulnerability factors
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Quarantine, Risk Factors, Spain, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review