Cited by 54Eating Disorders and BehaviorsChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

A comparison of the eating disorder service experiences of autistic and non-autistic women in the UK

Open access
Babb, Charli, Brede, Janina, Jones, Catherine R. G., Serpell, Lucy, Mandy, William, Fox, John·2022·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Qualitative studies report that autistic women have poor experiences when being treated for an eating disorder (ED) and express that ED services are not appropriately tailored to meet their needs. It is unclear whether their experience differs to other women accessing ED services. The aim of the current study was to compare autistic and non-autistic women's ED illness history and experiences in ED services. METHOD: An online survey about ED illness history and their experience with ED treatment was completed by 46 autistic women with a restrictive ED and 110 non-autistic women with a restrictive ED. RESULTS: Despite some similarities, there were three key differences in the experiences reported by autistic and non-autistic women. First, autistic women reported a longer duration of ED and being diagnosed with an ED at a younger age than non-autistic women. Second, autistic women reported accessing a broader range of healthcare settings and ED treatments than non-autistic women when being treated for an ED. Finally, autistic women rated their experiences of inpatient care, dietetic input, and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) as significantly less beneficial than non-autistic women when being treated for an ED. CONCLUSION: These findings increase understanding of autistic women's ED experience and can help to shape ED services and treatments to better accommodate the needs of their autistic clients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2930

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Keys, A., Brožek, J., Henschel, A., Mickelsen, O., & Taylor, H. L. (1950). The biology of human starvation (Vol. 2).
  2. World Health Organization (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th ed.). PMC13531092 42683092

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babb, C., Brede, J., Jones, C. R. G., Serpell, L., Mandy, W., & Fox, J.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Mandy, William
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
616-627
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W4283747798
Cited by
54
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
autistic women, eating disorders, restrictive eating disorders, eating disorder treatment, patient experience, inpatient care, dietetics, cognitive behavioral therapy, health care access
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Autistic Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review