Cited by 48Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The relationship between parental bonding, social problem solving and eating pathology in an anorexic inpatient sample

Swanson, Helen, Power, Kevin, Collin, Paula, Deas, Suzanne, Paterson, Gillian, Grierson, David, Yellowlees, Alex, Park, Katy +1 more·2010·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Objective Parental relationships and maladaptive problem solving have been associated with anorexic symptomatology. This study investigates the relationship between perceived parental bonding, social problem solving and eating psychopathology. Methods Forty three female inpatients with anorexia nervosa and 76 student controls were assessed using the Parental Bonding Instrument, the Social Problem Solving Inventory and the Eating Disorders Examination or the Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire. Results The anorexic group reported significantly lower levels of parental care than the student control group and used more negative and avoidance style coping. In the anorexic group, disordered eating was significantly correlated with low maternal care and high control. Maternal bonding was found to mediate the relationship between avoidance style coping and eating pathology. Conclusions Findings suggest a relationship between maternal bonding, the use of maladaptive problem solving techniques and eating disorder pathology in inpatients with anorexia nervosa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.967

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with non-anorexia nervosa controls, people with anorexia nervosa report lower positive problem orientation on the Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised.

    “All three studies found, that compared to a non‐AN control group, people with AN report different attitudes toward problem solving than non‐AN controls, namely lower positive problem orientation and higher negative problem orientation.”
  • People with anorexia nervosa do not differ from non-anorexia nervosa controls on rational problem-solving style on the Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised.

    “However, those with AN show relative strengths in their ability to use a rational problem‐solving style and their scores did not differ from non‐AN controls on this subscale of the SPSRI (Paterson, Power, Yellowlees, Park, & Taylor, 2007; Patterson et al., 2010; Swanson et al., 2010).”
  • Compared with non-anorexia nervosa controls, people with anorexia nervosa report higher impulsive-careless social problem-solving style.

    “These studies also found that people with AN show differences in social problem‐solving styles, reporting a higher impulsive–careless style (i.e., a dysfunctional problem‐solving dimension characterized by active problem‐solving attempts that are impulsive, careless, hurried, and incomplete) and greater avoidance (an avoidance problem‐solving style refers to procrastination, passivity, or inaction”
  • Compared with non-anorexia nervosa controls, people with anorexia nervosa report higher negative problem orientation on the Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised.

    “All three studies found, that compared to a non‐AN control group, people with AN report different attitudes toward problem solving than non‐AN controls, namely lower positive problem orientation and higher negative problem orientation.”
  • Compared with non-anorexia nervosa controls, people with anorexia nervosa report greater avoidance social problem-solving style.

    “These studies also found that people with AN show differences in social problem‐solving styles, reporting a higher impulsive–careless style (i.e., a dysfunctional problem‐solving dimension characterized by active problem‐solving attempts that are impulsive, careless, hurried, and incomplete) and greater avoidance (an avoidance problem‐solving style refers to procrastination, passivity, or inaction”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 48

Authors
Swanson, H., Power, K., Collin, P., Deas, S., Paterson, G., Grierson, D., Yellowlees, A., Park, K., & Taylor, L.
Affiliations
  • NHS Tayside (GB)
  • Global Foundation for Eating Disorders (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, Helen
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-13
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
22-32
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W1994960710
Cited by
48
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, parental bonding, maternal care, maternal control, social problem solving, avoidance coping, negative coping, disordered eating, eating pathology, mediation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Body Image, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review