The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost modeling of lithium‐ion battery cells for automotive applications
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to highlight the technical and economic issues arising in lithium‐ion cells for automotive applications, and to indicate some potential solutions to lower the cost. This topic has already been the subject of some studies, but, although of primary importance, the role on cost of a cell design parameter, the electrode coating thickness, has rarely been described. This study intends to explore particularly the influence of this parameter. To do so, the cost of cells with four positive electrode materials (NMC, NCA, LFP, and LMO), and the same negative electrode material are compared at several electrode thickness. The cost of these cells is computed using an innovative model and varies between 230 and 400 $ per kWh. With the assumptions used, it appears that the potential savings resulting from doubling the electrode coating thickness from 50 to 100 μ m at a given porosity represent roughly 25% of the cell cost. The electrode coating thickness emerges as an essential parameter for an unbiased cells cost comparison. This article gives a view of the current lithium‐ion cells costs, and provides guidelines to lower cells cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications
Barré, A., Deguilhem, B., Grolleau, S., Gérard, M., Suard, F., & Riu, D. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 · Cited by 1,758
Cited by
Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries
Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 · Cited by 3,233
Placke, T., Kloepsch, R., Dühnen, S., & Winter, M. (2017) · Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10008-017-3610-7 · Cited by 1,117
Building Safe Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Review
Duan, J., Tang, X., Dai, H., Yang, Y., Wu, W., Wei, X., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-019-00060-4 · Cited by 893
Hesse, H., Schimpe, M., Kucevic, D., & Jossen, A. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10122107 · Cited by 770
Battery cost forecasting: a review of methods and results with an outlook to 2050
Mauler, L., Duffner, F., Zeier, W. G., & Leker, J. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee01530c · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Patry, G., Romagny, A., Martinet, S., & Froelich, D.
- Venue
- Energy Science & Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-22
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-82
- ISSN
- 2050-0505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056174177
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost modeling of lithium‐ion battery cells for automotive applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ese3.47
- The paper
- Patry, G., Romagny, A., Martinet, S., & Froelich, D. (2015). Cost modeling of lithium‐ion battery cells for automotive applications. Energy Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.47
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.