Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 893

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building Safe Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Review

Open access
Duan, Jian, Tang, Xuan, Dai, Haifeng, Yang, Ying, Wu, Wangyan, Wei, Xuezhe, Huang, Yunhui·2020·Electrochemical Energy Reviews

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), with relatively high energy density and power density, have been considered as a vital energy source in our daily life, especially in electric vehicles. However, energy density and safety related to thermal runaways are the main concerns for their further applications. In order to deeply understand the development of high energy density and safe LIBs, we comprehensively review the safety features of LIBs and the failure mechanisms of cathodes, anodes, separators and electrolyte. The corresponding solutions for designing safer components are systematically proposed. Additionally, the in situ or operando techniques, such as microscopy and spectrum analysis, the fiber Bragg grating sensor and the gas sensor, are summarized to monitor the internal conditions of LIBs in real time. The main purpose of this review is to provide some general guidelines for the design of safe and high energy density batteries from the views of both material and cell levels. Graphic Abstract: Safety of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with high energy density becomes more and more important in the future for EVs development. The safety issues of the LIBs are complicated, related to both materials and the cell level. To ensure the safety of LIBs, in-depth understanding of the safety features, precise design of the battery materials and real-time monitoring/detection of the cells should be systematically considered. Here, we specifically summarize the safety features of the LIBs from the aspects of their voltage and temperature tolerance, the failure mechanism of the LIB materials and corresponding improved methods. We further review the in situ or operando techniques to real-time monitor the internal conditions of LIBs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41918-019-00060-4

Cites

205 of 205 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 205 references

Cited by

See all 893

Metadata

Authors
Duan, J., Tang, X., Dai, H., Yang, Y., Wu, W., Wei, X., & Huang, Y.
Venue
Electrochemical Energy Reviews
Published
2019-12-28
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-42
ISSN
  • 2520-8136 (ISSN-L)
  • 2520-8489
OpenAlex
W2997099008
Cited by
893
References
205
FWCI
33.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building Safe Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s41918-019-00060-4
The paper
Duan, J., Tang, X., Dai, H., Yang, Y., Wu, W., Wei, X., & Huang, Y. (2020). Building Safe Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles: A Review. Electrochemical Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-019-00060-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.