The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, eastern Oregon
Abstract
Channel incision is a widespread phenomenon throughout the dry interior Columbia River basin and other semi‐arid regions of the world, which degrades stream habitat by fundamentally altering natural ecological, geomorphological and hydrological processes. We examined the extent of localized aggradation behind beaver dams on an incised stream in the interior Columbia River basin to assess the potential for using beaver, Castor canadensis, dams to restore such channels, and the effect of the aggradation on riparian habitat. We estimated aggradation rates behind 13 beaver dams between 1 and 6 years old on Bridge Creek, a tributary to the John Day River in eastern Oregon. Vertical aggradation rates are initially rapid, as high as 0·47 m yr−1, as the entrenched channel fills, then level off to 0·075 m yr−1 by year six, as the sediment begins accumulating on adjacent terraces. We found that a 0·5 m elevation contour above the stream channel approximately coincided with the extent of new riparian vegetation establishment. Therefore, we compared the area surrounding reaches upstream of beaver dams that were within 0·5 m elevation of the stream channel with adjacent reaches where no dams existed. We found that there was five times more area within 0·5 m elevation of the channel upstream of beaver dams, presumably because sediment accumulation had aggraded the channel. Our results suggest that restoration strategies that encourage the recolonization of streams by beaver can rapidly expand riparian habitat along incised streams. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The science and practice of river restoration
Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016874 · Cited by 710
Waples, R. S., Beechie, T., & Pess, G. R. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02626-140103 · Cited by 163
Self-citationHolocene beaver damming, fluvial geomorphology, and climate in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming
Persico, L., & Meyer, G. (2009) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2008.09.007 · Cited by 77
Hawley, R. J. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biy048 · Cited by 76
Estimating the benefits of widespread floodplain reconnection for Columbia River Chinook salmon
Bond, M. H., Nodine, T. G., Beechie, T. J., & Zabel, R. W. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2018-0108 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pollock, M. M., Beechie, T. J., & Jordan, C. E.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1174-1185
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2096150230
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, eastern Oregon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/esp.1553
- The paper
- Pollock, M. M., Beechie, T. J., & Jordan, C. E. (2007). Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, eastern Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.