The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of forest harvesting on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows in steep terrain of central Japan
Abstract
Landslides and debris flows associated with forest harvesting can cause much destruction and the influence of the timing of harvesting on these mass wasting processes therefore needs to be assessed in order to protect aquatic ecosystems and develop improved strategies for disaster prevention. We examined the effects of forest harvesting on the frequency of landslides and debris flows in the Sanko catchment (central Japan) using nine aerial photo periods covering 1964 to 2003. These photographs showed a mosaic of different forest ages attributable to the rotational management in this area since 1912. Geology and slope gradient are rather uniformly distributed in the Sanko catchment, facilitating assessment of forest harvesting effects on mass wasting without complication of other factors. Trends of new landslides and debris flows correspond to changes in slope stability explained by root strength decay and recovery; the direct impact of clearcutting on landslide occurrence was greatest in forest stands that were clearcut 1 to 10 yr earlier with progressively lesser impacts continuing up to 25 yr after harvesting. Sediment supply rate from landslides in forests clearcut 1 to 10 yr earlier was about 10‐fold higher than in control sites. Total landslide volume in forest stands clearcut 0 to 25 yr earlier was 5·8 × 10 3 m 3 km−2 compared with 1·3 × 10 3 m 3 km−2 in clearcuts >25 yr, indicating a fourfold increase compared with control sites during the period when harvesting affected slope stability. Because landslide scars continue to produce sediment after initial failure, sediment supply from landslides continues for 45 yr in the Sanko catchment. To estimate the effect of forest harvesting and subsequent regeneration on the occurrence of mass wasting in other regions, changes in root strength caused by decay and recovery of roots should be investigated for various species and environmental conditions. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016
Froude, M. J., & Petley, D. N. (2018) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-18-2161-2018 · Cited by 2,339
Landslides in a changing climate
Gariano, S. L., & Guzzetti, F. (2016) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.011 · Cited by 1,737
A review of the ecosystem functions in oil palm plantations, using forests as a reference system
Dislich, C., Keyel, A. C., Salecker, J., Kisel, Y., Meyer, K. M., Auliya, M., Barnes, A. D., Corre, M. D., Darras, K., Faust, H., et al. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12295 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Imaizumi, F., Sidle, R. C., & Kamei, R.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-17
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 827-840
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2039978396
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of forest harvesting on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows in steep terrain of central Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/esp.1574
- The paper
- Imaizumi, F., Sidle, R. C., & Kamei, R. (2008). Effects of forest harvesting on the occurrence of landslides and debris flows in steep terrain of central Japan. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.