The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys
Open accessAbstract
Structure‐from‐motion (SfM) photogrammetry is revolutionising the collection of detailed topographic data, but insight into geomorphological processes is currently restricted by our limited understanding of SfM survey uncertainties. Here, we present an approach that, for the first time, specifically accounts for the spatially variable precision inherent to photo‐based surveys, and enables confidence‐bounded quantification of 3D topographic change. The method uses novel 3D precision maps that describe the 3D photogrammetric and georeferencing uncertainty, and determines change through an adapted state‐of‐the‐art fully 3D point‐cloud comparison (M3C2), which is particularly valuable for complex topography. We introduce this method by: (1) using simulated UAV surveys, processed in photogrammetric software, to illustrate the spatial variability of precision and the relative influences of photogrammetric (e.g. image network geometry, tie point quality) and georeferencing (e.g. control measurement) considerations; (2) we then present a new Monte Carlo procedure for deriving this information using standard SfM software and integrate it into confidence‐bounded change detection; before (3) demonstrating geomorphological application in which we use benchmark TLS data for validation and then estimate sediment budgets through differencing annual SfM surveys of an eroding badland. We show how 3D precision maps enable more probable erosion patterns to be identified than existing analyses, and how a similar overall survey precision could have been achieved with direct survey georeferencing for camera position data with precision half as good as the GCPs'. Where precision is limited by weak georeferencing (e.g. camera positions with multi‐metre precision, such as from a consumer UAV), then overall survey precision can scale as n‐½ of the control precision (n = number of images). Our method also provides variance–covariance information for all parameters. Thus, we now open the door for SfM practitioners to use the comprehensive analyses that have underpinned rigorous photogrammetric approaches over the last half‐century. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information
Hirschmuller, H. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1166 · Cited by 4,195
Lague, D., Brodu, N., & Leroux, J. (2013) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.04.009 · Cited by 1,408
Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets
Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E., & Sear, D. A. (2010) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1886 · Cited by 1,160
James, M. R., & Robson, S. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2011jf002289 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citationLucieer, A., de Jong, S. M., & Turner, D. (2013) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133313515293 · Cited by 748
Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multi-View Stereopsis
Furukawa, Y., & Ponce, J. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383246 · Cited by 692
James, M. R., Robson, S., d'Oleire-Oltmanns, S., & Niethammer, U. (2017) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.021 · Cited by 636
Self-citationImage-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments
Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Castillo, C., Rock, G., Neugirg, F., & Abellán, A. (2016) · Earth Surface Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esurf-4-359-2016 · Cited by 588
Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport
Brasington, J., Langham, J., & Rumsby, B. T. (2002) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/s0169-555x(02)00320-3 · Cited by 529
Woodget, A. S., Carbonneau, P. E., Visser, F., & Maddock, I. P. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3613 · Cited by 424
Cited by
Guidelines on the use of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry in geomorphic research
James, M. R., Chandler, J. H., Eltner, A., Fraser, C., Miller, P. E., Mills, J. P., Noble, T., Robson, S., & Lane, S. N. (2019) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.4637 · Cited by 294
Self-citationEscobar Villanueva, J. R., Iglesias Martínez, L., & Pérez Montiel, J. I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19143205 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- James, M. R., Robson, S., & Smith, M. W.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1769-1788
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2598533724
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 57.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/esp.4125
- The paper
- James, M. R., Robson, S., & Smith, M. W. (2017). 3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.