Full propagation of analytical uncertainties in Δ47 measurements
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1029/2020gc009592
Abstract
Clumped-isotope measurements in CO2 and carbonates (Δ47) present a number of technical challenges and require correcting for various sources of analytical non-linearity. For now we lack a formal description of the analytical errors associated with these correction steps, which are not accounted for in most data processing methods currently in use. Here we formulate a quantitative description of Δ47 error propagation, fully taking into account standardization errors and their properties. We describe various standardization strategies, along with the assumptions they rely on, in the context of this model, and propose a new, “pooled” standardization approach designed to yield more robust/accurate corrections. User-friendly online resources and an open-source Python library are also provided to facilitate the use of these error models. Among other uses, the mathematical framework described here may be helpful to improve standardization protocols (e.g., anchor/unknown ratios) and inform future efforts to define community reference materials.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Anderson, N. T., Kelson, J. R., Kele, S., Daëron, M., Bonifacie, M., Horita, J., Mackey, T. J., John, C. M., Kluge, T., Petschnig, P., et al. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl092069 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Daëron, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Daëron, Mathieu
- ORCID
- Daëron, Mathieu
- Venue
- Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-12-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3137845640
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE01-0004)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.161.365)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- clumped isotopes, Δ47, error propagation, analytical uncertainty, carbon dioxide, carbonates, reference materials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review