How Hot Is Too Hot? Disentangling Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse Paleoclimate from Diagenesis
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1029/2022pa004517 · Paper page
Abstract
The North American Newark Canyon Formation (~113–98 Ma) presents an opportunity to examine how various terrestrial carbonate facies reflect different aspects of paleoclimate during one of the hottest periods of Earth’s history. We combined carbonate facies analysis with δ13C, δ18O, and Δ47 datasets to assess which palustrine and lacustrine facies preserve stable isotope signals that are most representative of climatic conditions. Type section palustrine facies record the heterogeneity of the original palustrine environment in which they formed. Using the pelmicrite facies that formed in deeper wetlands, we interpret a lower temperature zone (35–40°C) to reflect warm season water temperatures. In contrast, the mottled micrite facies reflects hotter temperatures (36–68°C). These hotter temperatures preserve radiatively heated “bare-skin” temperatures that occurred in a shallow depositional setting. The lower lacustrine unit has been secondarily altered by hydrothermal fluids while the upper lacustrine unit likely preserves primary temperatures and δ18Owater of catchment-integrated precipitation. Based on this investigation, the palustrine pelmicrite and lacustrine micrite are the facies most likely to reflect ambient climate conditions, and therefore, are the best facies to use for paleoclimate interpretations. Average warm season water temperatures of 41.1±3.6°C and 37.8±2.5°C are preserved by the palustrine pelmicrite (~113–112 Ma) and lacustrine micrite (~112–103 Ma), respectively. These data support previous interpretations of the mid-Cretaceous as a hothouse climate. Our study demonstrates the importance of characterizing facies for identifying the data most representative of past climates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Anderson, N. T., Kelson, J. R., Kele, S., Daëron, M., Bonifacie, M., Horita, J., Mackey, T. J., John, C. M., Kluge, T., Petschnig, P., et al. (2021) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2020gl092069 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Fetrow, A. C., Snell, K., Fiori, R. V. D., Long, S. P., & Bonde, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Idaho (US)
- Washington State University (US)
- State of Nevada (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fetrow, Anne C
- Venue
- Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-07-22
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 2572-4517 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309047098
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1524765, 1650115, 1524853, 1524785)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
- Keywords
- carbonate facies, palustrine wetlands, lake sediments, stable isotopes, oxygen isotopes, carbon isotopes, hydrothermal alteration, diagenesis, paleotemperature, micrite, paleoclimate proxies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review