The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of acute and chronic toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate to Daphnia magna
Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) are now widely used as antibacterial products, and their potential toxicities in aquatic organisms are a matter of increasing concern. In the present study, we conducted experiments to reveal the acute and chronic toxicities of AgNP and its bioaccumulation from both aqueous and dietary sources in a model freshwater cladoceran, Daphnia magna. No mortality was observed in 48-h acute toxicity testing when the daphnids were exposed up to 500 µg Ag/L as AgNP. The AgNP accumulation reached as high as 22.9 mg Ag/g dry weight at the highest AgNP concentration tested (500 µg/L). In contrast, D. magna was extremely sensitive to free Ag ion (Ag+, added as AgNO3), with a measured 48-h 50% lethal concentration of 2.51 µg/L. Thus, any AgNP potential acute toxicity may be caused by the release of Ag+ into the solution. During the 21-d chronic exposure, dietborne AgNO3 had the most significant influence on reproduction, whereas waterborne AgNP had the most significant inhibition on growth. Significant delay and decrease of reproduction in daphnids exposed to dietborne AgNO3 occurred at a dissolved Ag concentration of 0.1 µg/L added to the algae. Significant inhibitions of growth and reproduction were also found for the AgNP exposure, with the lowest observed effective concentration of 5 µg/L and 50 µg/L, respectively. Chronic effects of AgNP were probably caused by the low food quality of algae associated with AgNP and the low depuration of ingested AgNP. Environmental risk assessments of AgNP should therefore include tests on the chronic toxicity to aquatic organisms as well as the direct and indirect effects of AgNP resulting from the release of Ag+ into the environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011; 30:885–892. © 2010 SETAC
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
George, S., Lin, S., Ji, Z., Thomas, C. R., Li, L., Mecklenburg, M., Meng, H., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Xia, T., et al. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn204671v · Cited by 366
Ivask, A., Juganson, K., Bondarenko, O., Mortimer, M., Aruoja, V., Kasemets, K., Blinova, I., Heinlaan, M., Slaveykova, V., & Kahru, A. (2014) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.855831 · Cited by 332
Microplastics: addressing ecological risk through lessons learned
Syberg, K., Khan, F. R., Selck, H., Palmqvist, A., Banta, G. T., Daley, J., Sano, L., & Duhaime, M. B. (2015) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2914 · Cited by 329
Osborne, O. J., Lin, S., Chang, C. H., Ji, Z., Yu, X., Wang, X., Lin, S., Xia, T., & Nel, A. E. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b04583 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, C.-M., & Wang, W.-X.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 885-892
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2108298316
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of acute and chronic toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate to Daphnia magna. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.451
- The paper
- Zhao, C.-M., & Wang, W.-X. (2011). Comparison of acute and chronic toxicity of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate to Daphnia magna. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.