The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors affecting mercury accumulation in fish in the upper michigan peninsula
Abstract
Fish were sampled from 35 drainage and seepage lakes in the upper Michigan peninsula and Wisconsin in conjunction with Phase II of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Eastern Lake Survey to explore the relationship between physicochemical characteristics of lakes and mercury concentrations in fish tissue. The lakes were selected using a stratified random design weighted for low pH to assess acidification effects on mercury bioaccumulation. Muscle tissue from yellow perch (Perca flavescens), northern pike (Esox lucius), white sucker (Catostomus commersoni) and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) was analyzed for total and methylmercury. Differences in mercury concentrations were found between species, and methylmercury accounted for 99% of total mercury. Relationships were examined between tissue concentrations of mercury in yellow perch and lake physicochemical variables including pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), calcium, conductivity, aluminum, total phosphorus, dissolved organic carbon, color, sulfate, lake area, lake depth, watershed area, Secchi depth and elevation. Mercury concentrations were negatively correlated with pH and ANC for both seepage and drainage lakes, but correlations with other water-quality characteristics varied with lake type. Dissolved organic carbon had a negative correlation with fish mercury accumulation in seepage lakes, but not in drainage lakes. Mercury concentrations had a positive correlation with age, weight and length in yellow perch.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review
Ravichandran, M. (2004) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011 · Cited by 1,254
On the Chemical Form of Mercury in Edible Fish and Marine Invertebrate Tissue
Bloom, N. S. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f92-113 · Cited by 1,243
Mercury in the Swedish environment ? Recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods
Lindqvist, O., Johansson, K., Bringmark, L., Timm, B., Aastrup, M., Andersson, A., Hovsenius, G., H�kanson, L., Iverfeldt, �., & Meili, M. (1991) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/bf00542429 · Cited by 965
Wiener, J., Krabbenhoft, D., Heinz, G., & Scheuhammer, A. (2002) · Handbook of Ecotoxicology, Second Edition · doi:10.1201/9781420032505.ch16 · Cited by 656
Bioaccumulation of mercury in pelagic freshwater food webs
Watras, C. J., Back, R. C., Halvorsen, S., Hudson, R. J. M., Morrison, K. A., & Wente, S. P. (1998) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00228-9 · Cited by 649
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieb, T. M., Bowie, G. L., Driscoll, C. T., Gloss, S. P., Schofield, C. L., & Porcella, D. B.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 919-930
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2154402668
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting mercury accumulation in fish in the upper michigan peninsula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620090710
- The paper
- Grieb, T. M., Bowie, G. L., Driscoll, C. T., Gloss, S. P., Schofield, C. L., & Porcella, D. B. (1990). Factors affecting mercury accumulation in fish in the upper michigan peninsula. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620090710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.