The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Chemical Form of Mercury in Edible Fish and Marine Invertebrate Tissue
Abstract
Total mercury, monomethylmercury (CH 3 Hg), and dimethylmercury ((CH 3)2 Hg) in edible muscle were examined in 229 samples, representing seven freshwater and eight saltwater fish species and several species of marine invertebrates using ultraclean techniques. Total mercury was determined by hot HNO 3/H 2 SO 4/BrClldigestion, SnCl 2 reduction, purging onto gold, and analysis by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS). Methylmercury was determined by KOH/methanol digestion using aqueous phase ethylation, cryogenic gas chromatography, and CVAFS detection. Total mercury and CH 3 Hg concentrations varied from 0.011 to 2.78 μg∙g−1 (wet weight basis, as Hg) for all samples, while no sample contained detectable (CH 3)2 Hg (<0.001 μg∙g−1 as Hg). The observed proportion of total mercury (as CH 3 Hg) ranged from 69 to 132%, with a relative standard deviation for quintuplicate analysis of about 10%; nearly all of this variability can be explained by the analytical variability of total mercury and CH 3 Hg. Poorly homogenized samples showed greater variability, primarily because total mercury and CH 3 Hg were measured on separate aliquots, which vary in mercury concentration, not speciation. I conclude that for all species studied, virtually ail (>95%) of the mercury present is as CH 3 Hg and that past reports of substantially lower CH 3 Hg fractions may have been biased by analytical and homogeneity variability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecotoxicology of Organotin Compounds
Fent, K. (1996) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.3109/10408449609089891 · Cited by 992
Selenium and mercury in organisms: Interactions and mechanisms
Yang, D.-Y., Chen, Y.-W., Gunn, J. M., & Belzile, N. (2008) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a08-001 · Cited by 304
Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998-2005
Scudder, B. C., Chasar, L. C., Wentz, D. A., Bauch, N. J., Brigham, M. E., Moran, P. W., & Krabbenhoft, D. P. (2009) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20095109 · Cited by 139
Garcia, E., & Carignan, R. (2005) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/04-065r.1 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, N. S.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1010-1017
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2061093169
- Cited by
- 1,243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Chemical Form of Mercury in Edible Fish and Marine Invertebrate Tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f92-113
- The paper
- Bloom, N. S. (1992). On the Chemical Form of Mercury in Edible Fish and Marine Invertebrate Tissue. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.