The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the lake Erie Basin
Abstract
This paper presents information on pesticide concentrations in Lake Erie tributaries draining agricultural watersheds, information distilled from data sets spanning nearly a decade and including up to 750 samples per tributary. Pesticide concentrations are strongly skewed and approximately lognormal. Average concentrations in tributaries are correlated with the amount applied in the basin, but with important secondary effects from chemical properties and modes of application of the pesticides. During runoff of storm events following application, concentrations rise rapidly, peak about the time of peak discharge, and decline slowly thereafter. These patterns do not match those for nutrients, major ions, or sediment, indicating a different pathway from the fields for pesticides. On an annual basis, elevated monthly average concentrations are usually observed from May to August, and low concentrations are present during the rest of the year. Monthly average concentrations of atrazine and alachlor generally exceed maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) in at least one month following application, but those of other herbicides do not. Annual averages are below MCLs for all compounds. No long-term trends are apparent. Comparisons of patterns in large and small tributaries show that small tributaries have higher maximum concentrations, more frequent concentrations below detection limit, and fewer intermediate concentrations. Smaller tributaries have more strongly skewed distributions and much greater temporal variability in concentrations than do larger rivers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters
Solomon, K. R., Baker, D. B., Richards, R. P., Dixon, K. R., Klaine, S. J., La Point, T. W., Kendall, R. J., Weisskopf, C. P., Giddings, J. M., Giesy, J. P., et al. (1996) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620150105 · Cited by 847
Self-citationEffects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams
Lenat, D. R., & Crawford, J. K. (1994) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00021291 · Cited by 586
Konstantinou, I. K., Hela, D. G., & Albanis, T. A. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.07.024 · Cited by 522
Schulz, R. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2004.4190 · Cited by 502
Pesticides in stream water within an agricultural catchment in southern Sweden, 1990–1996
Kreuger, J. (1998) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00155-7 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, R. P., & Baker, D. B.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-26
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2159036717
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the lake Erie Basin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620120104
- The paper
- Richards, R. P., & Baker, D. B. (1993). Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the lake Erie Basin. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620120104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.