Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For temperate streams, riparian canopy cover is a very important parameter structuring the fish fauna in relation to longitudinal distribution and to deforestation.
“For temperate streams, riparian canopy cover is a very important parameter structuring the fish fauna in relation to longitudinal distribution and to deforestation (e.g.Schlosser, 1991;Hughes & Noss, 1992;Lenat & Crawford, 1994;Collares-Pereira et al., 1995;Wang et al., 1997;Harding et al., 1998;Jones et al., 1999;Marsh-Matthews & Matthews, 2000).”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lenat & Crawford, 1994
Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of deforestation on total fish abundance.
“Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of deforestation on total fish abundance (Lenat & Crawford, 1994;Agostinho & Penczak, 1995;Lyons et al., 1995;Harding et al., 1998).”
From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Lenat & Crawford, 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Streams in the Urban Landscape
Paul, M. J., & Meyer, J. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040 · Cited by 2,795 · see citing works
Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams
Bojsen, B. H., & Barriga, R. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00956.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Carstens, K., Anderson, J., Bachman, P., De Schrijver, A., Dively, G., Federici, B., Hamer, M., Gielkens, M., Jensen, P., Lamp, W., et al. (2012) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-011-9569-8 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Jeffrey, J. D., Hasler, C. T., Chapman, J. M., Cooke, S. J., & Suski, C. D. (2015) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icv022 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lenat, D. R., & Crawford, J. K.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- Venue
- Hydrobiologia
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 294
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 185-199
- ISSN
- 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5117
- OpenAlex
- W2033647989
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Hydrobiologia (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- land use, stream water quality, aquatic organisms, suspended sediment, nutrients, dissolved nitrogen, heavy metals, fish assemblages, macroinvertebrates, Ephemeroptera, Chironomidae, Oligochaeta, periphyton, detritus, urban rivers, agricultural streams, forest streams, Piedmont streams, North Carolina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
