The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. I. Water and tissue
Abstract
A method is presented for developing water quality criteria (WQC) for type I narcotic chemicals in general and PAHs in particular. The criteria can be applied to any individual or mixture of narcotic chemicals using only the chemical's octanol-water partition coefficient KOW. It is derived from a database of LC50s comprising 156 chemicals and 33 species, including fish, amphibians, arthropods, mollusks, polychaetes, coelenterates, and protozoans. A target lipid model is proposed that accounts for variations in toxicity due to differing species sensitivities and chemical differences. The model is based on the idea that a target lipid is the site of action in the organism. Further, it is assumed that target lipid has the same lipid-octanol linear free energy relationship for all species. This implies that the slope of the log(LC50)–log(KOW) relationship is the same for all species. However, individual species may have varying target lipid body burdens that cause toxicity. The target lipid LC50 body burdens derived from concentration data in the water only are compared to measured total lipid LC50 body burdens for five species. They are essentially equal, indicating that the target lipid concentration is equal to the total extracted lipid concentration. The precise relationship between partitioning in target lipid and octanol is established. The species-specific body burdens are used to determine the WQC final acute value, i.e., the 95-percentile level of protection. An acute-to-chronic ratio is used to compute the body burden corresponding to the WQC final chronic value, which is the procedure used to derive the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency water quality criteria. The criteria are expressed either as dissolved concentrations in the water column or as tissue concentrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J., Hoff, D. J., Hornung, M. W., Johnson, R. D., Mount, D. R., Nichols, J. W., Russom, C. L., Schmieder, P. K., et al. (2009) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.34 · Cited by 2,734
Incardona, J. P., Day, H. L., Collier, T. K., & Scholz, N. L. (2006) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2006.09.018 · Cited by 319
Goodrum, P. E., Anderson, J. K., Luz, A. L., & Ansell, G. K. (2021) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfaa123 · Cited by 118
Droge, S. T. J. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05052 · Cited by 112
Considerations for toxicity experiments and risk assessments with PFAS mixtures
McCarthy, C. J., Roark, S. A., & Middleton, E. T. (2021) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.4415 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Toro, D. M., McGrath, J. A., & Hansen, D. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-08-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1951-1970
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2000511845
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.