The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge
Abstract
Twelve different sulfonamides were selected for a biodegradation study using a respirometric screening test and an activated sludge simulation test. A simple bacterial growth inhibition test was applied to show that the sulfonamides did not affect the bacteria at the concentration levels used. None of the compounds were degraded in the screening test, leading to the conclusion that sulfonamides cannot be classified as readily biodegradable. In the simulation test, primary degradation of mixtures of four compounds at concentration levels of 250 to 500 μg/L were tested and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography. Biodegradation occurred after lag phases of 7 to 10 d at 20°C when nonadapted sludge was applied. Test compounds were degraded within a few days. At 6°C, degradation lag phases and degradation rates were three to four times longer. Degradation curves fit well to the logistic growth model, indicating growth of specific degraders in the test system. Sulfonamide adapted bacterial cultures were able to degrade either the same compounds as previously added or four other sulfonamides in a rapid and uniform way (t1/2 from 0.2 to 3 d). This finding shows that if capable of degrading one sulfonamide substance, these bacteria may also degrade many other sulfonamides. In practice, this implies that because the biodegradation rate is found to be identical for several sulfonamides in the sludge, the compounds may be assessed as a group by studying only a few compounds in applications such as environmental fate assessments. The mechanism for inducement of sulfonamide adaptation to the bacteria was not revealed in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers
Ternes, T. A. (1998) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00099-2 · Cited by 3,425
Occurrence of Antibiotics in the Aquatic Environment
Hirsch, R., Ternes, T., Haberer, K., & Kratz, K.-L. (1999) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(98)00337-4 · Cited by 2,140 · cited 1×
“Ternes and co-workers measured up to 1 mg/L of sulfamethoxasole in German sewage water [32].”
BackgroundWastewater treatment: biological and chemical processes
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4531 · Cited by 1,224
Statistics for analytical chemistry
Nielsen, E. (1987) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/0379-0738(87)90151-4 · Cited by 1,028
Pharmaceuticals in the Environment
Kümmerer, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-052809-161223 · Cited by 816
The fate of pharmaceutical chemicals in the aquatic environment
Richardson, M. L., & Bowron, J. M. (1985) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1985.tb04922.x · Cited by 741
Martindale: The Extra Pharmacopoeia
Turner, P. (1994) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pgmj.70.823.389-b · Cited by 406
Simkins, S., & Alexander, M. (1984) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.47.6.1299-1306.1984 · Cited by 404
Buser, H.-R., Müller, M. D., & Theobald, N. (1998) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9705811 · Cited by 355
Analytical profiles of drug substances
Kho, B. T. (1972) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/0026-265x(72)90125-7 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Sarmah, A. K., Meyer, M. T., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2006) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026 · Cited by 3,326
Luo, Y., Xu, L., Rysz, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es104009s · Cited by 964
Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes
Le-Minh, N., Khan, S. J., Drewes, J. E., & Stuetz, R. M. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.020 · Cited by 778
Batt, A. L., Kim, S., & Aga, D. S. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.008 · Cited by 542
Occurrence and Fate of Human Pharmaceuticals in the Environment
Monteiro, S. C., & Boxall, A. B. A. (2010) · Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1157-5_2 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingerslev, F., & Halling-Sørensen, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2467-2473
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W1990718836
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620191011
- The paper
- Ingerslev, F., & Halling-Sørensen, B. (2000). Biodegradability properties of sulfonamides in activated sludge. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620191011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.