The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in estuarine fish and invertebrates as an indicator of organophosphorus insecticide exposure and effects
Open accessAbstract
The majority of insecticidescurrently in use are organophosphorus, carbamate, and synthetic pyrethroid compounds. Organophosphorus insecticides (OPs) produce toxicity by inhibiting the cholinesterase enzymes in the nervous system. Monitoring of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition has been widely used in terrestrial and freshwater aquatic systems as an indicator of OP exposure and effects. This review describes the use of AChE inhibition as a biomarker in the estuarine environment, discusses the relationship between AChE inhibition and other manifestations of OP toxicity, and highlights areas where additional research is needed. A variety of studies with estuarine fish have suggested that brain AChE inhibition levels of >70% are associated with mortality in most species. Selected species, however, appear capable of tolerating much higher levels (>90%) of brain inhibition. Sublethal effects on stamina have been reported for some estuarine fish in association with brain AChE inhibition levels as low as 50%. Most studies suggest, however, that these effects are observed only when brain AChE inhibition is at near-lethal levels. A number of field studies have successfully used AChE inhibition in fish as a biomarker in the estuarine environment. The use of AChE inhibition as a biomarker in estuarine invertebrates has been less well studied. Although AChE inhibition has been measured in the tissues of a variety of invertebrate species following OP exposure, the relationship between AChE inhibition and lethality is less distinct. Additional work is needed in both fish and invertebrates to better explain species-specific differences in the relationship between AChE inhibition and mortality and to investigate other physiological perturbations associated with AChE inhibition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review
van der Oost, R., Beyer, J., & Vermeulen, N. P. E. (2003) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s1382-6689(02)00126-6 · Cited by 4,895
Tollefsen, K. E., Scholz, S., Cronin, M. T., Edwards, S. W., de Knecht, J., Crofton, K., Garcia-Reyero, N., Hartung, T., Worth, A., & Patlewicz, G. (2014) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.009 · Cited by 377
Maltby, L., Clayton, S. A., Wood, R. M., & McLoughlin, N. (2002) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620210219 · Cited by 278
Effects of dimethoate and beta-naphthoflavone on selected biomarkers of Poecilia reticulata
Frasco, M. F., & Guilhermino, L. (2002) · Fish Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1025457831923 · Cited by 258
Baeeri, M., Momtaz, S., Navaei-Nigjeh, M., Niaz, K., Rahimifard, M., Ghasemi-Niri, S. F., Sanadgol, N., Hodjat, M., Sharifzadeh, M., & Abdollahi, M. (2017) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2016.12.008 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Fulton, M. H., & Key, P. B.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-45
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2170114755
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in estuarine fish and invertebrates as an indicator of organophosphorus insecticide exposure and effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620200104
- The paper
- Fulton, M. H., & Key, P. B. (2001). Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in estuarine fish and invertebrates as an indicator of organophosphorus insecticide exposure and effects. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.