The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of initial cell density on the bioavailability and toxicity of copper in microalgal bioassays
Abstract
Algal toxicity tests based on growth inhibition over 72 h have been extensively used to assess the toxicity of contaminants in natural waters. However, these laboratory tests use high cell densities compared to those found in aquatic systems in order to obtain a measurable algal response. The high cell densities and test duration can result in changes in chemical speciation, bioavailability, and toxicity of contaminants throughout the test. With the recent application of flow cytometry to ecotoxicology, it is now possible to use lower initial cell densities to minimize chemical speciation changes. The speciation and toxicity of copper in static bioassays with the tropical freshwater alga Chlorella sp. and the temperate species Selenastrum capricornutum (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) were investigated at a range of initial cell densities (102-105 cells/ml). Copper toxicity decreased with increasing initial cell density. Copper concentrations required to inhibit growth (cell division) rate by 50% (72-h median effective concentration [EC50]) increased from 4.6 to 16 μg/L for Chlorella sp. and from 6.6 to 17 μg/L for S. capricornutum as the initial cell density increased from 102 to 105 cells/ml. Measurements of anodic stripping voltammetry—labile, extracellular, and intracellular copper confirmed that at higher initial cell densities, less copper was bound to the cells, resulting in less copper uptake and lower toxicity. Chemical measurements indicated that reduced copper toxicity was due primarily to depletion of dissolved copper in solution, with solution speciation changes due to algal exudates and pH playing a minor role. These findings suggest that standard static laboratory bioassays using 104 to 105 algal cells/ml may seriously underestimate metal toxicity in natural waters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Soil protists: a fertile frontier in soil biology research
Geisen, S., Mitchell, E. A. D., Adl, S., Bonkowski, M., Dunthorn, M., Ekelund, F., Fernández, L. D., Jousset, A., Krashevska, V., Singer, D., et al. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy006 · Cited by 729
Metal uptake by microalgae: Underlying mechanisms and practical applications
Monteiro, C. M., Castro, P. M. L., & Malcata, F. X. (2012) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.1504 · Cited by 414
Miazek, K., Iwanek, W., Remacle, C., Richel, A., & Goffin, D. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms161023929 · Cited by 257
Wilde, K. L., Stauber, J. L., Markich, S. J., Franklin, N. M., & Brown, P. L. (2006) · Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00244-004-0256-0 · Cited by 192
Self-citationWang, Q., Yu, Z., & Wei, D. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123499 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Franklin, N. M., Stauber, J. L., Apte, S. C., & Lim, R. P.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 742-751
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W4241523079
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of initial cell density on the bioavailability and toxicity of copper in microalgal bioassays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620210409
- The paper
- Franklin, N. M., Stauber, J. L., Apte, S. C., & Lim, R. P. (2002). Effect of initial cell density on the bioavailability and toxicity of copper in microalgal bioassays. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210409
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.