Cited by 4Higher Education Research StudiesYouth Development and Social SupportCareer Development and Diversity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

College Access Program Alumni Reflect on Their Experiences in the Program and Its Impact on Their Skills and College Outcomes

Open access

Abstract

An evaluation of the Princeton University Preparatory Program (PUPP), a college access program for low‐income and high‐achieving public high school students, yielded favorable findings regarding the perceptions of program alumni. PUPP Alumni Survey respondents (N = 126) reported that PUPP had positively impacted their development of academic and social–emotional skills and their knowledge of college admissions and financial aid application processes and that they attended and graduated from college, including selective colleges, after completing PUPP. Some PUPP alumni believe that the program made college attendance a reality for them, while others believe PUPP enabled them to attend a more selective college than they otherwise would have. Although alumni were not immune from continued challenges, both financial and academic, during college, they tended to attribute their college enrollment and graduation successes at least in part to the personalized supports and resources PUPP provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ets2.12176

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

2 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Higher Education Research Institute, 2015, Findings from the 2015 college senior survey (HERI Reseach brief)
  2. National Association of Colleges and Employers, 2014, The class of 2014 student survey report results from NACE's annual survey of college students
  3. National Association of Colleges and Employers, 2016, Salary survey executive summary: Final starting salaries for the class of 2015 new college graduates date reported by colleges and universities
  4. Saenz V., 2007, First in my family: A profile of first‐generation college students at four‐year institutions since 1971

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Millett, C. M., Saunders, S. R., & Kevelson, M. J. C.
Affiliations
Educational Testing Service (US)
Corresponding author
Millett, Catherine M.
Venue
ETS Research Report Series
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
2018
Issue
1
Pages
1-64
ISSN
2330-8516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790170782
Cited by
3
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ETS Research Report Series (publishedVersion)
  • ETS Research Report Series
Funders
Princeton University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
college access programs, college enrollment, college graduation, selective colleges, university admission, financial aid, socioemotional skills, academic skills, low-income students, high-achieving students, public high school students, individualized support, alumni perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review