The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A secure and optimally efficient multi‐authority election scheme
Abstract
In this paper we present a new multi‐authority secret‐ballot election scheme that guarantees privacy, universal veriability, and robustness. It is the first scheme for which the performance is optimal in the sense that time and communication complexity is minimal both for the individual voters and the authorities. An interesting property of the scheme is that the t and communication complexity for the voter is independent of the number of authorities. A voter simply posts a single encrypted message accompanied by a compact proof that it contains a valid vote. Our result is complementary to the result by Cramer, Franklin, Schoenmakers, and Yung in the sense that in their scheme the work for voters is linear in the number of authorities but can be instantiated to yield information‐theoretic privacy, while in our scheme the voter's effort is independent of the number of authorities but always provides computational privacy‐protection. We will also point out that the majority proposed voting schemes provide computational privacy only (often without even considering the lack of information‐theoretic privacy), and that our new scheme is by far superior to those schemes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shamir, A. (1979) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359168.359176 · Cited by 13,756
A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms
Elgamal, T. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1985.1057074 · Cited by 8,059
Cited by
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
A Survey on Homomorphic Encryption Schemes: Theory and Implementation
Acar, A., Aksu, H., Uluagac, A. S., & Conti, M. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3214303 · Cited by 1,397
A Simple Publicly Verifiable Secret Sharing Scheme and Its Application to Electronic Voting
Schoenmakers, B. (1999) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48405-1_10 · Cited by 448
Self-citationA Survey of Homomorphic Encryption for Nonspecialists
Fontaine, C., & Galand, F. (2007) · EURASIP Journal on Information Security · doi:10.1155/2007/13801 · Cited by 438
Coercion-resistant electronic elections
Juels, A., Catalano, D., & Jakobsson, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/1102199.1102213 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Cramer, R., Gennaro, R., & Schoenmakers, B.
- Venue
- European Transactions on Telecommunications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 481-490
- ISSN
- 1124-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1541-8251
- OpenAlex
- W2138784757
- Cited by
- 784
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A secure and optimally efficient multi‐authority election scheme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ett.4460080506
- The paper
- Cramer, R., Gennaro, R., & Schoenmakers, B. (1997). A secure and optimally efficient multi‐authority election scheme. European Transactions on Telecommunications. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4460080506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.