The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Framing participatory evaluation
Abstract
This chapter posits two principal streams of participatory evaluation, practical participatory evaluation and transformative participatory evaluation, and compares them on a set of dimensions relating to control, level, and range of participation. The authors then situate them among other forms of collaborative evaluations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Participatory Research Methods – Choice Points in the Research Process
Vaughn, L. M., & Jacquez, F. (2020) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.13244 · Cited by 871
Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis
Rosas, S. R., & Kane, M. (2012) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003 · Cited by 592
A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009
Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C. (2011) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214010389321 · Cited by 531
Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence
Kirkhart, K. E. (2000) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1188 · Cited by 300
Zeledon, I., West, A., Antony, V., Telles, V., Begay, C., Henderson, B., Unger, J. B., & Soto, C. (2020) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.04.003 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E.
- Venue
- New Directions for Evaluation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 1998
- Issue
- 80
- Pages
- 5-23
- ISSN
- 1097-6736 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-875X
- OpenAlex
- W2127752606
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing participatory evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ev.1114
- The paper
- Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
