Cited by 531Evaluation and Performance AssessmentAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesPublic Policy and Administration Research

A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009

Coryn, Chris L. S., Noakes, Lindsay A., Westine, Carl D., Schröter, Daniela C.·2011·American Journal of Evaluation

Abstract

Although the general conceptual basis appeared far earlier, theory-driven evaluation came to prominence only a few decades ago with the appearance of Chen’s 1990 book Theory-Driven Evaluations. Since that time, the approach has attracted many supporters as well as detractors. In this paper, 45 cases of theory-driven evaluations, published over a twenty-year period, are systematically examined to ascertain how closely theory-driven evaluation practices comport with the key tenants of theory-driven evaluation as described and prescribed by prominent theoretical writers. Evidence derived from this review to repudiate or substantiate many of the claims put forth both by critics of and advocates for theory-driven forms of evaluation are presented and an agenda for future research on the approach is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098214010389321

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C.
Affiliations
Western Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Coryn, Chris L. S.
Venue
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2010-11-12
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
199-226
ISSN
  • 1098-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0878
OpenAlex
W2012207800
Cited by
531
References
167
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
theory-based evaluation, evaluation theory, assessment practices, evaluation methodology, evaluation design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review