The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence
Abstract
This chapter recasts evaluation use in terms of influence and proposes an integrated theory that conceptualizes evaluation influence in three dimensions—source, intention, and time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Utilization-Focused Evaluation
(2018) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n729 · Cited by 2,308
Utilization-focused evaluation : the new century text
Patton, M. Q. (1997) · Cited by 1,469
Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation
(2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119171386 · Cited by 1,353
Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs.
Hendrickson, L., & Cronbach, L. J. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068975 · Cited by 1,042
Scriven, M. S. (1991) · Cited by 956
Using Social Research in Public Policy Making.
Rieker, P. P., & Weiss, C. H. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065222 · Cited by 934
Framing participatory evaluation
Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1114 · Cited by 680
Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion
Weiss, C. H. (1980) · Knowledge · doi:10.1177/107554708000100303 · Cited by 669
Foundations of program evaluation. Theories of practice
Bond, J. (1992) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/0020-7489(92)90034-e · Cited by 447
Research On the Utilization of Evaluations
Leviton, L. C., & Hughes, E. F. X. (1981) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8100500405 · Cited by 358
Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional
Roberts, A. R. (1983) · Journal of Education for Social Work · doi:10.1080/00220612.1983.10778623 · Cited by 340
Current Empirical Research on Evaluation Utilization
Cousins, J. B., & Leithwood, K. A. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170319 · Cited by 339
Quinn Patton, M. (1994) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90026-4 · Cited by 336
Truth Tests and Utility Tests: Decision-Makers' Frames of Reference for Social Science Research
Weiss, C. H., & Bucuvalas, M. J. (1980) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095127 · Cited by 314
Utilization-focused evaluation
Neigher, W. D. (1979) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90051-x · Cited by 308
Utilization-focused evaluation
Sonnichsen, R. C. (1987) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(87)90043-7 · Cited by 278
Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation
Greene, J. G. (1988) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x8801200201 · Cited by 265
Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986
Shulha, L. M., & Cousins, J. B. (1997) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/s0886-1633(97)90027-1 · Cited by 238
Evaluating Action Programs: Readings in Social Action and Education
Weiss, C. H. (1972) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 221
Patton, M. Q. (1998) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/13563899822208437 · Cited by 218
Fetterman, D. M. (1994) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90055-8 · Cited by 202
Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Aims, Methods, and Institutional Arrangements.
Cain, P. S., & Cronbach, L. J. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068404 · Cited by 170
Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements
Weiss, C. H. (1981) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(81)90038-0 · Cited by 152
Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization
Johnson, R. B. (1998) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)00048-7 · Cited by 129
Alkin, M. C., Patton, M. Q., & Weiss, C. H. (1990) · Cited by 127
Current and Developing Conceptions of Use: Evaluation Use TIG Survey Results
Preskill, H. S., & Caracelli, V. J. (1997) · Evaluation Practice · doi:10.1016/s0886-1633(97)90028-3 · Cited by 109
The history of participatory evaluation and current debates in the field
Brisolara, S. (1998) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1115 · Cited by 109
Presidential Address: Empowerment Evaluation.
Fetterman, D. M. (1994) · Evaluation Practice · Cited by 102
Utilizing evaluation: Concepts and measurement techniques
Jos, M. (1981) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(81)90042-2 · Cited by 79
Evaluation as sensemaking: Knowledge construction in a realist world
Julnes, G., & Mark, M. M. (1998) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1099 · Cited by 38
Evaluation utilization revisited
Smith, M. F. (1988) · New Directions for Program Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1486 · Cited by 28
A realist theory and analysis of utilization
Henry, G. T., & Rog, D. J. (1998) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1102 · Cited by 17
McClintock, C. C., & Colosi, L. (1998) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x9802200505 · Cited by 12
Toward a Social Ecological View of Evaluation Use
Conner, R. (1998) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s1098-2140(99)80201-x · Cited by 8
Cited by
School-level organizational routines for learning: supporting data use
M. Kallemeyn, L. (2014) · Journal of Educational Administration · doi:10.1108/jea-02-2013-0025 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkhart, K. E.
- Venue
- New Directions for Evaluation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 2000
- Issue
- 88
- Pages
- 5-23
- ISSN
- 1097-6736 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-875X
- OpenAlex
- W2110065514
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
