The emergence of human uniqueness: Characters underlying behavioral modernity
Abstract
Abstract Although scientists are aware that humans share the same biological heritage as do all other organisms on the planet, the reliance of Homo sapiens on culture and cooperation has resulted in what can best be described as “a spectacular evolutionary anomaly.” 1:11 The extra‐somatic adaptations, technological dominance, and success of our species in colonizing every terrestrial habitat have no parallel. 2 Moreover, Homo sapiens accounts for about eight times as much biomass as do all other terrestrial wild vertebrates combined, 3 an amount equivalent to the biomass of all 14,000+ species of ants, 4 the most successful terrestrial invertebrates. Human societies are complex, with more specialized economic niches in the United States than the total number of mammalian species on the planet. 5 While some might suggest that only post‐industrial humans achieved stunning biological success, data suggest that humans living as hunter‐gatherers would have attained a world population of more than 70 million individuals 6 and a total biomass greater than that of any other large vertebrate on the planet if agriculture had not been repeatedly invented as they spread.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shift in the social context of human child rearing, occurring together with a protracted postnatal development of cortical connectivity, likely created new opportunities for imitative learning and cumulative, intergenerational development of cultural traditions to become central features of the human adaptive complex.
“This shift in the social context of human child rearing, occurring together with a protracted postnatal development of cortical connectivity (54,55), likely created new opportunities for imitative learning and cumulative, intergenerational development of cultural traditions to become central features of the human adaptive complex (56,57).”
From Metabolic costs and evolutionary implications of human brain development (2014) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 164 · Cited by 387
- Authors
- Hill, K., Barton, M., & Hurtado, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hill, Kim
- Hurtado, A. Magdalena
- Venue
- Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 187-200
- ISSN
- 1060-1538 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6505
- OpenAlex
- W2087357474
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 432.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- human uniqueness, behavioral modernity, human, cultural evolution, cooperation, technological hegemony, hunter-gatherers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review