Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foundations of translational ecology

Enquist, Carolyn AF, Jackson, Stephen T, Garfin, Gregg M, Davis, Frank W, Gerber, Leah R, Littell, Jeremy A, Tank, Jennifer L, Terando, Adam J, Wall, Tamara U, Halpern, Benjamin, Hiers, J Kevin, Morelli, Toni Lyn, McNie, Elizabeth, Stephenson, Nathan L, Williamson, Matthew A, Woodhouse, Connie A, Yung, Laurie, Brunson, Mark W, Hall, Kimberly R, Hallett, Lauren M, Lawson, Dawn M, Moritz, Max A, Nydick, Koren, Pairis, Amber, Ray, Andrea J, Regan, Claudia, Safford, Hugh D, Schwartz, Mark W, Shaw, M Rebecca·2017·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
DOI 10.1002/fee.1733
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ecologists who specialize in translational ecology ( TE ) seek to link ecological knowledge to decision making by integrating ecological science with the full complement of social dimensions that underlie today's complex environmental issues. TE is motivated by a search for outcomes that directly serve the needs of natural resource managers and decision makers. This objective distinguishes it from both basic and applied ecological research and, as a practice, it deliberately extends research beyond theory or opportunistic applications. TE is uniquely positioned to address complex issues through interdisciplinary team approaches and integrated scientist–practitioner partnerships. The creativity and context‐specific knowledge of resource managers, practitioners, and decision makers inform and enrich the scientific process and help shape use‐driven, actionable science. Moreover, addressing research questions that arise from on‐the‐ground management issues – as opposed to the top‐down or expert‐oriented perspectives of traditional science – can foster the high levels of trust and commitment that are critical for long‐term, sustained engagement between partners.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/fee.1733

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Flexner A, 1939, The usefulness of useless science, Harpers Magazine, 179, 544
  2. Levin SA, 2010, The evolution of ecology, The Chronicle of Higher Education
  3. NRC (National Research Council), 2005, Thinking strategically: the appropriate use of metrics for the Climate Change Science Program
  4. NRC (National Research Council), 2006, Linking knowledge with action for sustainable development: the role of program management

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Enquist, C. A., Jackson, S. T., Garfin, G. M., Davis, F. W., Gerber, L. R., Littell, J. A., Tank, J. L., Terando, A. J., Wall, T. U., Halpern, B., Hiers, J. K., Morelli, T. L., McNie, E., Stephenson, N. L., Williamson, M. A., Woodhouse, C. A., Yung, L., Brunson, M. W., Hall, K. R., Hallett, L. M., Lawson, D. M., Moritz, M. A., Nydick, K., Pairis, A., Ray, A. J., Regan, C., Safford, H. D., Schwartz, M. W., & Shaw, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Climate Science Center US Geological Survey (USGS) Tucson AZ
  • School of Natural Resources and the Environment Institute of the Environment University of Arizona Tucson AZ
  • National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis University of California–Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA
  • School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Tempe AZ
  • Alaska Climate Science Center USGS Anchorage AK
  • Department of Biological Sciences University of Notre Dame Notre Dame IN
  • Southeast Climate Science Center USGS Raleigh NC
  • Desert Research Institute Reno NV
  • Tall Timbers Research Station Tallahassee FL
  • Northeast Climate Science Center USGS Amherst MA
  • Western Water Assessment Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado at Boulder Boulder CO
  • Western Ecological Research Center USGS Three Rivers CA
  • Department of Environmental Science and Policy University of California–Davis Davis CA
  • School of Geography and Development University of Arizona Tucson AZ
  • WA Franke College of Forestry and Conservation University of Montana Missoula MT
  • Department of Environment and Society Utah State University Logan UT
  • North America Conservation Region The Nature Conservancy Lansing MI
  • Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, and Department of Biology University of Oregon Eugene OR
  • Environmental Sciences and Applied Systems Branch, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific US Navy San Diego CA
  • Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California–Berkeley Berkeley CA
  • Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks National Park Service Three Rivers CA
  • Climate Science Alliance–South Coast California Department of Fish and Wildlife San Diego CA
  • Physical Sciences Division, Earth System Research Lab National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder CO
  • Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center USGS Bozeman MT
  • World Wildlife Fund San Francisco CA
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
541-550
ISSN
  • 1540-9295
  • 1540-9309
DOI
10.1002/fee.1733
Cited by
273
References
61
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • University of Arizona

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.