The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved methods of combining forecasts
Abstract
It is well known that a linear combination of forecasts can outperform individual forecasts. The common practice, however, is to obtain a weighted average of forecasts, with the weights adding up to unity. This paper considers three alternative approaches to obtaining linear combinations. It is shown that the best method is to add a constant term and not to constrain the weights to add to unity. These methods are tested with data on forecasts of quarterly hog prices, both within and out of sample. It is demonstrated that the optimum method proposed here is superior to the common practice of letting the weights add up to one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bates, J. M., & Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.1969.103 · Cited by 3,201
Self-citation
Cited by
Electricity price forecasting: A review of the state-of-the-art with a look into the future
Weron, R. (2014) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,646
Chapter 4 Forecast Combinations
Timmermann, A. (2006) · Handbook of Economic Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s1574-0706(05)01004-9 · Cited by 1,314
Optimal Linear Combinations of Neural Networks
Hashem, S. (1997) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00098-6 · Cited by 499
Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy
Gupta, H. V., Clark, M. P., Vrugt, J. A., Abramowitz, G., & Ye, M. (2012) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2011wr011044 · Cited by 466
Hendry, D. F., & Clements, M. P. (2004) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1368-423x.2004.00119.x · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Granger, C. W. J., & Ramanathan, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-204
- ISSN
- 0277-6693 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-131X
- OpenAlex
- W2161020850
- Cited by
- 1,150
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved methods of combining forecasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/for.3980030207
- The paper
- Granger, C. W. J., & Ramanathan, R. (1984). Improved methods of combining forecasts. Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980030207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.