Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomes

Telenius, HÅKan, Ponder, Bruce A. J., Tunnacliffe, Alan, Pelmear, Adèle H., Carter, Nigel P., Ferguson‐Smith, Malcolm A., Behmel, Annemarie, Nordenskjöld, Magnus, Pfragner, Roswitha·1992·Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer

Abstract

A novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique has been combined with chromosome flow sorting to characterise two lymphoblastoid cell lines and one medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line carrying translocations close to the locus for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A). Five hundred copies of the derivative chromosome(s) were flow sorted from each cell line and amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide‐primed–polymerase chain reaction (DOP‐PCR). This generated pools of DNA sequences corresponding to the abnormal chromosomes, which were then used as probes in fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) experiments on normal metaphase cells. The resultant chromosome paints revealed the portions of the normal chromosomes related to those involved in the translocations. By this technique, translocation breakpoints in bands p15, q11.2, and q21 of chromosome 10 were defined in the above cell lines, in two cases refining previous cytogenetic data. This study shows that flow sorting of aberrant chromosomes and chromosome painting can be used as a rapid aid to cytogenetic analysis, particularly in cases of difficult karyotypes, such as tumours. Furthermore, the DOP‐PCR technique described here will have applications to other areas of genome analysis, such as cloning of new markers; its design will allow a general and representative amplification to occur from any starting DNA in any species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gcc.2870040311

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Telenius, H., Ponder, B. A. J., Tunnacliffe, A., Pelmear, A. H., Carter, N. P., Ferguson‐Smith, M. A., Behmel, A., Nordenskjöld, M., & Pfragner, R.
Venue
Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-04
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
257-263
ISSN
  • 1045-2257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2264
OpenAlex
W2158507204
Cited by
573
References
1
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gcc.2870040311
The paper
Telenius, H., Ponder, B. A. J., Tunnacliffe, A., Pelmear, A. H., Carter, N. P., Ferguson‐Smith, M. A., Behmel, A., Nordenskjöld, M., & Pfragner, R. (1992). Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomes. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.2870040311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.