The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomes
Abstract
A novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique has been combined with chromosome flow sorting to characterise two lymphoblastoid cell lines and one medullary thyroid carcinoma cell line carrying translocations close to the locus for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN 2A). Five hundred copies of the derivative chromosome(s) were flow sorted from each cell line and amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide‐primed–polymerase chain reaction (DOP‐PCR). This generated pools of DNA sequences corresponding to the abnormal chromosomes, which were then used as probes in fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) experiments on normal metaphase cells. The resultant chromosome paints revealed the portions of the normal chromosomes related to those involved in the translocations. By this technique, translocation breakpoints in bands p15, q11.2, and q21 of chromosome 10 were defined in the above cell lines, in two cases refining previous cytogenetic data. This study shows that flow sorting of aberrant chromosomes and chromosome painting can be used as a rapid aid to cytogenetic analysis, particularly in cases of difficult karyotypes, such as tumours. Furthermore, the DOP‐PCR technique described here will have applications to other areas of genome analysis, such as cloning of new markers; its design will allow a general and representative amplification to occur from any starting DNA in any species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., & Arnheim, N. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999980 · Cited by 8,956
Cited by
du Manoir, S., Speicher, M. R., Joos, S., Schröck, E., Popp, S., Döhner, H., Kovacs, G., Robert-Nicoud, M., Lichter, P., & Cremer, T. (1993) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202476 · Cited by 555
Chandra, T., Kirschner, K., Thuret, J.-Y., Pope, B. D., Ryba, T., Newman, S., Ahmed, K., Samarajiwa, S. A., Salama, R., Carroll, T., et al. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.010 · Cited by 308
Amano, T., Sagai, T., Tanabe, H., Mizushina, Y., Nakazawa, H., & Shiroishi, T. (2009) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.011 · Cited by 268
Chromosome painting: a useful art
Ried, T. (1998) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/7.10.1619 · Cited by 154
Deregulation of EIF4E: a novel mechanism for autism
Neves-Pereira, M., Müller, B., Massie, D., Williams, J. H. G., O’Brien, P. C. M., Hughes, A., Shen, S.-B., Clair, D. S., & Miedzybrodzka, Z. (2009) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.066852 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Telenius, H., Ponder, B. A. J., Tunnacliffe, A., Pelmear, A. H., Carter, N. P., Ferguson‐Smith, M. A., Behmel, A., Nordenskjöld, M., & Pfragner, R.
- Venue
- Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-263
- ISSN
- 1045-2257 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2264
- OpenAlex
- W2158507204
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gcc.2870040311
- The paper
- Telenius, H., Ponder, B. A. J., Tunnacliffe, A., Pelmear, A. H., Carter, N. P., Ferguson‐Smith, M. A., Behmel, A., Nordenskjöld, M., & Pfragner, R. (1992). Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using dop‐pcr amplified flow‐sorted chromosomes. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.2870040311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.