CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Soil and Environmental StudiesArchaeological Research and ProtectionGeophysical Methods and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“There's more than meets the eye”: Developing an integrated archaeological approach to reconstruct human–environment dynamics in the Pontine marshes (Lazio, Central Italy)

Open access
Tol, Gijs, de Haas, Tymon, Sevink, Jan, Schepers, Mans, Ullrich, Burkart, de Neef, Wieke·2021·Geoarchaeology
DOI 10.1002/gea.21814
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this article, we present the results of a pilot study that adopts an interdisciplinary off‐site approach combining detailed surface survey, remote sensing analyses, geophysical prospections, geoarchaeological investigations and palaeoenvironmental analyses to investigate long‐term human‐environment interactions in the Pontine plain (Lazio, Central Italy). Focusing on a small study area just north of the ancient Roman way station of Ad Medias, in the middle of this former wetland, the developed integrated approach turned out to be very much successful, providing additional information on (a) the interpretation of the surface record in light of landscape and environmental dynamics, (b) the exposure of “hidden landscapes” that date from before the Roman phase of exploitation that is well‐attested in the surface archaeological record, and (c) the texture of this Roman landscape, allowing for a more accurate interpretation of both mapped surface materials and the wider context in which these surface sites were set.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gea.21814

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Alcock S., 2004, Comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean world
  2. Alessandri L., 2013, Latium Vetus in the Bronze Age and Early Iron Age (BAR International Series 2565)
  3. Attema P., 1993, An archaeological survey in the Pontine Region. A contribution to the settlement history of south Lazio 900–100 BC
  4. Attema P., 2011, Between Satricum and Antium: Settlement dynamics in a coastal landscape in Latium Vetus (Babesch Supplements 18)
  5. Bakels C., 2015, The Agro Pontino region, refuge after the Early Bronze Age Avellino eruption of Mount Vesuvius, Italy? Analecta Preahistorica Leidensia, 45, 55
  6. Beug H. J., 2004, Leitfaden der Pollenbestimmung für Mitteleuropa und angrenzende Gebiete
  7. Cancellieri M., 1985, Misurare la terra: centuriazione e coloni nel mondo romano. Città, agricoltura, commercio: materiali da Roma e dal suburbio, 44
  8. Cancellieri M., 1990, Il territorio Pontino e la Via Appia, Archeologia Laziale, 61
  9. Coarelli F., 2005, Noctes Campanae. Studi di storia antica ed archeologia dell'Italia preromana e romana in memoria di Martin W. Frederiksen, 181
  10. Haas T., 2012, Comparative issues in the archaeology of the Roman rural landscape. Site classification between survey, excavation and historical categories, 55
  11. deHaas T. &Tol G.(forthcoming).The analytical potential of intensive field survey data: Developments in the collection analysis and interpretation of surface ceramics within the Pontine Region project. In:M.Nazou A.Meens&W.van dePut(Eds.) Fields Sherds and Scholars. Recording and Interpreting Survey Ceramics.
  12. Forni B., 1981, Dalla ignicoltura cerealicola del prossimo oriente alla genesi dell'aratrocoltura in Italia: Suo significato, struttura, conseguenze culturali, Rivista di storia dell'agricoltura, 1, 183
  13. Hofmann M., 1956, Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft Suppl. VIII, 1135
  14. Jacomet S., 2006, Identification of cereal remains from archaeological sites
  15. Jahn R., 2006, Guidelines for soil description
  16. Linoli A., 2005, Integrated land and water resources management in history, 27
  17. Meyer C., 2012, Proceedings of the 1st MAC International Workshop of Archaeological Geophysics, 59
  18. Powlesland D., 2009, Seeing the unseen. Geophysics and landscape archaeology, 167
  19. Sevink J., 1992, The Agro Pontino Survey Project: Methods and preliminary results (Studies in Prae‐ en Protohistorie 6), 31
  20. Snodgrass A. M., 1994, Classical Greece: Ancient histories and modern archaeologies, 197
  21. Tol G., 2016, The role of minor centres in regional economies: New insights from recent archaeological fieldwork in the lower Pontine plain, The Amphora, 44, 33
  22. Gorp W., 2020, The role of subsidence in Early Bronze Age lake and sea level reconstruction in the Agro Pontino (Lazio, Italy) over the last 4ka using the Avellino tephra marker bed, Catena
  23. Leusen M., 2011, Proceedings of the international meeting, Siena, Italy
  24. Walsh K., 2014, Human‐Environment Interaction from the Neolithic to the Roman Period

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tol, G., de Haas, T., Sevink, J., Schepers, M., Ullrich, B., & de Neef, W.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Faculty of Archaeology Leiden University Leiden Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • Eastern Atlas GmbH & Co KG Berlin Germany
  • Department of Archaeology Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Corresponding author
Tol, Gijs
ORCID
Venue
Geoarchaeology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-06
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
109-129
ISSN
  • 0883-6353 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6548
DOI
10.1002/gea.21814
OpenAlex
W3038526995
Cited by
14
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Geoarchaeology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Early Career Research Grant, The University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysical Methods and Applications
Keywords
Pontine marshes, human-nature relationship, wetland archaeology, hidden landscapes, paleoenvironmental reconstruction, geophysical survey, remote sensing, landscape dynamics, Roman landscape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review