The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene‐gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity
Abstract
The identification and characterization of genes that influence the risk of common, complex multifactorial diseases, primarily through interactions with other genes and other environmental factors, remains a statistical and computational challenge in genetic epidemiology. This challenge is partly due to the limitations of parametric statistical methods for detecting genetic effects that are dependent solely or partially on interactions with other genes and environmental exposures. We previously introduced multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) as a method for reducing the dimensionality of multilocus genotype information to improve the identification of polymorphism combinations associated with disease risk. The MDR approach is nonparametric (i.e., no hypothesis about the value of a statistical parameter is made), is model‐free (i.e., assumes no particular inheritance model), and is directly applicable to case‐control and discordant sib‐pair study designs. Both empirical and theoretical studies suggest that MDR has excellent power for identifying high‐order gene‐gene interactions. However, the power of MDR for identifying gene‐gene interactions in the presence of common sources of noise is not currently known. The goal of this study was to evaluate the power of MDR for identifying gene‐gene interactions in the presence of noise due to genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic or locus heterogeneity. Using simulated data, we show that MDR has high power to identify gene‐gene interactions in the presence of 5% genotyping error, 5% missing data, or a combination of both. However, MDR has reduced power for some models in the presence of 50% phenocopy, and very limited power in the presence of 50% genetic heterogeneity. Extending MDR to address genetic heterogeneity should be a priority for the continued methodological development of this new approach. Genet. Epidemiol. 24:150–154, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,522
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 20,825
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Classification and regression trees
Praagman, J. (1985) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(85)90321-2 · Cited by 10,053
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3 · Cited by 9,655
Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour
Bellman, R. E. (1961) · doi:10.1515/9781400874668 · Cited by 2,802
Ritchie, M. D., Hahn, L. W., Roodi, N., Bailey, L. R., Dupont, W. D., Parl, F. F., & Moore, J. H. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/321276 · Cited by 1,898
Self-citationHahn, L. W., Ritchie, M. D., & Moore, J. H. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btf869 · Cited by 1,133
Self-citationThe Risk of Determining Risk with Multivariable Models
Concato, J., Feinstein, A. R., & Holford, T. R. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00009 · Cited by 1,115
Cited by
Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix
Li, J., & Ji, L. (2005) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800717 · Cited by 1,458
Moore, J. H., Gilbert, J. C., Tsai, C.-T., Chiang, F.-T., Holden, T., Barney, N., & White, B. C. (2006) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.036 · Cited by 608
Self-citationVelez, D. R., White, B. C., Motsinger, A. A., Bush, W. S., Ritchie, M. D., Williams, S. M., & Moore, J. H. (2007) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20211 · Cited by 384
Self-citationMoore, J. H., & Williams, S. M. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20236 · Cited by 340
Self-citationMachine Learning for Detecting Gene-Gene Interactions: A Review
McKinney, B. A., Reif, D. M., Ritchie, M. D., & Moore, J. H. (2006) · Applied Bioinformatics · doi:10.2165/00822942-200605020-00002 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritchie, M. D., Hahn, L. W., & Moore, J. H.
- Venue
- Genetic Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-23
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-157
- ISSN
- 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2272
- OpenAlex
- W2083944388
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene‐gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gepi.10218
- The paper
- Ritchie, M. D., Hahn, L. W., & Moore, J. H. (2003). Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene‐gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. Genetic Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.10218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.