The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene–gene and gene–environment interactions
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Polymorphisms in human genes are being described in remarkable numbers. Determining which polymorphisms and which environmental factors are associated with common, complex diseases has become a daunting task. This is partly because the effect of any single genetic variation will likely be dependent on other genetic variations (gene–gene interaction or epistasis) and environmental factors (gene–environment interaction). Detecting and characterizing interactions among multiple factors is both a statistical and a computational challenge. To address this problem, we have developed a multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) method for collapsing high-dimensional genetic data into a single dimension thus permitting interactions to be detected in relatively small sample sizes. In this paper, we describe the MDR approach and an MDR software package. Results: We developed a program that integrates MDR with a cross-validation strategy for estimating the classification and prediction error of multifactor models. The software can be used to analyze interactions among 2–15 genetic and/or environmental factors. The dataset may contain up to 500 total variables and a maximum of 4000 study subjects. Availability: Information on obtaining the executable code, example data, example analysis, and documentation is available upon request. Contact: moore@phg.mc.vanderbilt.edu Supplementary information: All supplementary information can be found at http://phg.mc.vanderbilt.edu/Software/MDR. * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3 · Cited by 9,655
Cited by
Detecting gene–gene interactions that underlie human diseases
Cordell, H. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2579 · Cited by 1,350
Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans
Cordell, H. J. (2002) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/11.20.2463 · Cited by 1,084
Prioritizing GWAS Results: A Review of Statistical Methods and Recommendations for Their Application
Cantor, R. M., Lange, K., & Sinsheimer, J. S. (2010) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.017 · Cited by 622
Moore, J. H., Gilbert, J. C., Tsai, C.-T., Chiang, F.-T., Holden, T., Barney, N., & White, B. C. (2006) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.036 · Cited by 608
Self-citationRitchie, M. D., Hahn, L. W., & Moore, J. H. (2003) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.10218 · Cited by 549
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, L. W., Ritchie, M. D., & Moore, J. H.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-02-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-382
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2131878646
- Cited by
- 1,133
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene–gene and gene–environment interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btf869
- The paper
- Hahn, L. W., Ritchie, M. D., & Moore, J. H. (2003). Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene–gene and gene–environment interactions. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btf869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.