Cited by 138Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and InferenceGene expression and cancer classification

Sequence Analysis Using Logic Regression

Kooperberg, Charles, Ruczinski, Ingo, LeBlanc, Michael L., Hsu, Li·2001·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Logic Regression is a new adaptive regression methodology that attempts to construct predictors as Boolean combinations of (binary) covariates. In this paper we use this algorithm to deal with single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sequence data. The predictors that are found are interpretable as risk factors of the disease. Significance of these risk factors is assessed using techniques like cross‐validation, permutation tests, and independent test sets. These model selection techniques remain valid when data is dependent, as is the case for the family data used here. In our analysis of the Genetic Analysis Workshop 12 data we identify the exact locations of mutations on gene 1 and gene 6 and a number of mutations on gene 2 that are associated with the affected status, without selecting any false positives. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.2001.21.s1.s626

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Logic regression, first introduced for sequence data analysis, does not require variants to be collapsed beforehand.

    “Logic regression, which is similar in ways to the method proposed by Han and Pan,40 was initially proposed for analyzing sequence data and does not assume that variants have been collapsed a priori.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kooperberg, C., Ruczinski, I., LeBlanc, M. L., & Hsu, L.
Affiliations
Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
21
Issue
S1
Pages
S626-31
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2114740540
Cited by
138
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA74841)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
logic regression, single nucleotide polymorphisms, genetic association, disease risk factors, model selection, permutation tests, family data, genetic mutations
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Chromosome Mapping, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Logistic Models, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review