Cited by 68Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structure

Understanding the accuracy of statistical haplotype inference with sequence data of known phase

Open access
Andrés, Aida M., Clark, Andrew G., Shimmin, Lawrence, Boerwinkle, Eric, Sing, Charles F., Hixson, James E.·2007·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Statistical methods for haplotype inference from multi‐site genotypes of unrelated individuals have important application in association studies and population genetics. Understanding the factors that affect the accuracy of this inference is important, but their assessment has been restricted by the limited availability of biological data with known phase. We created hybrid cell lines monosomic for human chromosome 19 and produced single‐chromosome complete sequences of a 48 kb genomic region in 39 individuals of African American (AA) and European American (EA) origin. We employ these phase‐known genotypes and coalescent simulations to assess the accuracy of statistical haplotype reconstruction by several algorithms. Accuracy of phase inference was considerably low in our biological data even for regions as short as 25–50 kb, suggesting that caution is needed when analyzing reconstructed haplotypes. Moreover, the reliability of estimated confidence in phase inference is not high enough to allow for a reliable incorporation of site‐specific uncertainty information in subsequent analyses. We show that, in samples of certain mixed ancestry (AA and EA populations), the most accurate haplotypes are probably obtained when increasing sample size by considering the largest, pooled sample, despite the hypothetical problems associated with pooling across those heterogeneous samples. Strategies to improve confidence in reconstructed haplotypes, and realistic alternatives to the analysis of inferred haplotypes, are discussed. Genet. Epidemiol. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.20185

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrés, A. M., Clark, A. G., Shimmin, L., Boerwinkle, E., Sing, C. F., & Hixson, J. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Andrés, Aida M.
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-05
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
659-671
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2105046484
Cited by
68
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50gm065509-10)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50-GM065509, GM-65509)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
haplotype inference, hybrid cell lines, chromosome 19, African American ancestry, mixed ancestry, sample size, coalescent simulation, association studies
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Black or African American, Cell Line, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Sequence Analysis, DNA, White People, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review