The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathway analysis by adaptive combination of P‐values
Open accessAbstract
It is increasingly recognized that pathway analyses—a joint test of association between the outcome and a group of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within a biological pathway—could potentially complement single‐SNP analysis and provide additional insights for the genetic architecture of complex diseases. Building upon existing P‐value combining methods, we propose a class of highly flexible pathway analysis approaches based on an adaptive rank truncated product statistic that can effectively combine evidence of associations over different SNPs and genes within a pathway. The statistical significance of the pathway‐level test statistics is evaluated using a highly efficient permutation algorithm that remains computationally feasible irrespective of the size of the pathway and complexity of the underlying test statistics for summarizing SNP‐ and gene‐level associations. We demonstrate through simulation studies that a gene‐based analysis that treats the underlying genes, as opposed to the underlying SNPs, as the basic units for hypothesis testing, is a very robust and powerful approach to pathway‐based association testing. We also illustrate the advantage of the proposed methods using a study of the association between the nicotinic receptor pathway and cigarette smoking behaviors. Genet. Epidemiol. 33:700–709, 2009. Published 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
Agresti, A. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471249688 · Cited by 6,746
A Powerful and Flexible Multilocus Association Test for Quantitative Traits
Kwee, L. C., Liu, D., Lin, X., Ghosh, D., & Epstein, M. P. (2008) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.10.010 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Gene set analysis of genome-wide association studies: Methodological issues and perspectives
Wang, L., Jia, P., Wolfinger, R. D., Chen, X., & Zhao, Z. (2011) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.04.006 · Cited by 207
Li, W.-Q., Hu, N., Wang, Z., Yu, K., Su, H., Wang, L., Wang, C., Chanock, S. J., Burdett, L., Ding, T., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068999 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, K., Li, Q., Bergen, A. W., Pfeiffer, R. M., Rosenberg, P. S., Caporaso, N., Kraft, P., & Chatterjee, N.
- Venue
- Genetic Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-30
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 700-709
- ISSN
- 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2272
- OpenAlex
- W2087467445
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathway analysis by adaptive combination of P‐values. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gepi.20422
- The paper
- Yu, K., Li, Q., Bergen, A. W., Pfeiffer, R. M., Rosenberg, P. S., Caporaso, N., Kraft, P., & Chatterjee, N. (2009). Pathway analysis by adaptive combination of P‐values. Genetic Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.