Cited by 207Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Gene set analysis of genome-wide association studies: Methodological issues and perspectives

Open access
Wang, Lily, Jia, Peilin, Wolfinger, Russell D., Chen, Xi, Zhao, Zhongming·2011·Genomics

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that gene set analysis, which tests disease association with genetic variants in a group of functionally related genes, is a promising approach for analyzing and interpreting genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. These approaches aim to increase power by combining association signals from multiple genes in the same gene set. In addition, gene set analysis can also shed more light on the biological processes underlying complex diseases. However, current approaches for gene set analysis are still in an early stage of development in that analysis results are often prone to sources of bias, including gene set size and gene length, linkage disequilibrium patterns and the presence of overlapping genes. In this paper, we provide an in-depth review of the gene set analysis procedures, along with parameter choices and the particular methodology challenges at each stage. In addition to providing a survey of recently developed tools, we also classify the analysis methods into larger categories and discuss their strengths and limitations. In the last section, we outline several important areas for improving the analytical strategies in gene set analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.04.006

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [14]Hong MG Pawitan Y Magnusson PK Prince JA Strategies and issues in the detection of pathway enrichment in genome-wide association studies Hum Genet 2009 126 289 301 19408013 PMC2865249
  2. [75]Perry JR McCarthy MI Hattersley AT Zeggini E Weedon MN Frayling TM C. Wellcome Trust Case Control Interrogating type 2 diabetes genome-wide association data using a biological pathway-based approach Diabetes 2009 58 1463 1467 19252133 PMC2682674

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Jia, P., Wolfinger, R. D., Chen, X., & Zhao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • SAS Institute (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Lily
  • Zhao, Zhongming
Venue
Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0888-7543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162960415
Cited by
207
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NICHD (5P30 HD015052-25)
  • NIH (1P50 MH078028-01A1, R21AA017437, P20AA017828, R01MH083094)
  • NCI (5P30CA068485-13)
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Core (P30CA68485)
  • NARSAD
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
gene set analysis, genome-wide association study, statistical power, linkage disequilibrium, gene length, overlapping genes, complex diseases
MeSH terms
Multigene Family, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review