Cited by 42Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

A B ayesian Integrative Genomic Model for Pathway Analysis of Complex Traits

Open access
Fridley, Brooke L., Lund, Steven, Jenkins, Gregory D., Wang, Liewei·2012·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

With new technologies, multiple types of genomic data are commonly collected on a single set of samples. However, standard analysis methods concentrate on a single data type at a time and ignore the relationships between genes, proteins, and biochemical reactions that give rise to complex phenotypes. In this paper, we propose a novel integrative model to incorporate multiple types of genomic data into an association analysis with a complex phenotype. The method combines path analysis and stochastic search variable selection into a Bayesian hierarchical model that simultaneously identifies both direct and indirect genomic effects on the phenotype. Results from a simulation study and application of the Bayesian model to a pharmacogenomic study of the drug gemcitabine demonstrate greater sensitivity to detect genomic effects in some simulation scenarios, when compared to the standard single data type analysis. Further research is required to extend and modify this integrative modeling framework to increase computational efficiency to best capitalize on the wealth of information available across multiple genomic data types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.21628

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fridley studied genomic effects of gemcitabine using mRNA expression and SNP high-throughput data.

    “Fridley (Fridley et al., 2012) has studied the genomic effects due to the gemcitabine drug using high-throughput data from mRNA expression and SNPs.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Fridley et al., 2012

  • Fridley integrated mRNA expression and SNP data into one large input matrix and developed a Bayesian pathway analysis using stochastic search variable selection.

    “They integrated these two datasets into one large input matrix and developed a Bayesian pathway analysis which uses a stochastic search variable selection.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Fridley et al., 2012

  • The Bayesian integrative model offers better performance in detecting genomic effects than conventional single-omics analysis.

    “Their proposed that the Bayesian integrative model offers better performance in detecting the genomic effects in comparison to using conventional single-omics analysis.”

    From Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Fridley et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fridley, B. L., Lund, S., Jenkins, G. D., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Fridley, Brooke L.
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-28
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
352-359
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W1575126878
Cited by
42
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Mayo Clinic
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (K22CA130828, R21CA140879, CA140879, CA138461, R01CA138461, CA130828)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21GM086689, U01GM061388, U19GM061388, GM86689, GM61388)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
pathway analysis, complex traits, Bayesian hierarchical model, stochastic search variable selection, path analysis, pharmacogenomics, gemcitabine, multi-omics integration, association analysis
MeSH terms
Gemcitabine, Algorithms, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Bayes Theorem, Cell Line, Deoxycytidine, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Theoretical, Monte Carlo Method, Pharmacogenetics, Phenotype, RNA, Messenger, Stochastic Processes, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review