Cited by 31Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesIonic liquids properties and applicationsExtraction and Separation Processes

Process analysis and economic evaluation of mixed aqueous ionic liquid and monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent for CO 2 capture from a coke oven plant

Oko, Eni, Zacchello, Baptiste, Wang, Meihong, Fethi, Aloui·2018·Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the process and economic impacts of using an aqueous mixture of 1‐butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate ([Bpy][BF4]) ionic liquid (IL) and monoethanolamine (MEA) as the solvent for CO2 capture from a coke‐oven plant. The gaps highlighted in the literature on the study of an aqueous mixture of IL and MEA for CO2 capture include lack of detailed process models or information on the impacts of varying the IL concentration on different process conditions and economics. This study addressed these needs by developing a rate‐based, solvent‐based CO2 capture process model with a mixed IL and MEA solvent and using the model to perform process and economic evaluations. The model was developed with Aspen Plus® and was used to investigate seven different aqueous mixtures of IL and MEA. The MEA concentration was 30 wt% for all the seven aqueous solvent mixtures, and the corresponding IL concentration was 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% for each combination. The hybrid IL solvent mixtures (i.e. 5–30 wt% IL) have 7–9% and 12–27% less regeneration energy and solvent circulation rate respectively compared to the base case (i.e. 30 wt% MEA). Based on a commercial‐scale cost benchmark for the IL, the initial solvent cost for the mixed solution is predictably higher. However, the solvent makeup cost is less for the mixed solvent. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ghg.1772

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]27. Wiley, D.E. and Ho, M.T. The opportunities for reducing CO2 emission in the iron and steel industry. UKCCSRC Biannual Meeting , Sept. 26-29, 2014, Cardiff UK. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/UKCCSRC/dianne-wiley-plenarycardiffbasep14 [Accessed Sept. 2017].
  2. [38]38. Bravo J. L., Rocha J. A., Fair J. R. A Comprehensive model in the performance of columns containing structured packings, distillation, and absorption, Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series 128. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1: PA48 -A507 (1992).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oko, E., Zacchello, B., Wang, M., & Fethi, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Department of Mechanical and Energetics School of Engineering ENSIAME Valenciennes France
Corresponding author
Wang, Meihong
Venue
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-16
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
686-700
ISSN
2152-3878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800445965
Cited by
31
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
EU FP7 International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) (PIRSES-GA-2013-612230)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
CO2 capture, ionic liquids, monoethanolamine, mixed solvents, coke oven plant, solvent regeneration, energy regeneration, process modeling, economic evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review